Family

FEMA Camps, Concentration Camps, Internment Camps Same Difference

With all the recent natural disasters hurricanes, wild fires and flooding hitting the United States and its territories as well as the threat of an impending war there has been a lot of activity and response by the Federal Emergency Management Agency Or FEMA. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is an arm of the United States Department of Homeland Security who’s primary purpose is to “coordinate the response to a disaster that has occurred in the United States and that overwhelms the resources of local and state authorities”.   FEMA also provides state and local governments with experts in specialized fields and funding for rebuilding efforts and relief funds for infrastructure by directing individuals to access low interest loans, in conjunction with the Small Business Administration. In addition to this, FEMA provides funds for training of response personnel throughout the United States and its territories as part of the agency’s preparedness effort. Following the September 11, 2001, attacks, Congress passed the Homeland Security Act of 2002, which created the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to better coordinate among the different federal agencies that deal with law enforcement, disaster preparedness and recovery, border protection and civil defense. FEMA was absorbed into DHS effective March 1, 2003. President George W. Bush appointed Michael D. Brown as FEMA’s director in January 2003.  Brown warned in September 2003 that FEMA’s absorption into the Department of Homeland Security would make a mockery of FEMA’s new motto, “A Nation Prepared”, and would “fundamentally sever FEMA from its core functions”, “shatter agency morale” and “break longstanding, effective and tested relationships with states and first responder stakeholders”. The inevitable result of the reorganization of 2003, warned Brown, would be “an ineffective and uncoordinated response” to a terrorist attack or a natural disaster.

Well those warnings proved to be more than true when Hurricane Katrina hit the United States.   Federal funding to affected states for “all hazards” disaster preparedness needs was not awarded unless the local agencies made the purposes for the funding a “just terrorism” function.  Emergency management professionals testified that funds for preparedness for natural hazards was given LESS priority than preparations for counter terrorism measures. Testimony also expressed the opinion that the mission to mitigate vulnerability and prepare for natural hazard disasters before they occurred had been separated from disaster preparedness functions, making the nation more vulnerable to known hazards, like hurricanes.  So basically after merging the Federal Emergency Management Agency into the Department of Homeland Security; FEMA became more about “counter terrorism” and “disaster management” than about natural disaster management with them defining what a “disaster” is.


As a part of its disaster planning efforts in the 1980’s FEMA began developing what they called “Crisis Relocation Planng”.  In conjunction with the FBI they began to scout the nation’s commercial buildings for possible refugee resettlement. In Arkansas, agents lined up a meeting with Walmart executives to discuss using the company’s huge stores, explaining as a cover that they wanted to learn crisis management techniques from companies that had large centralized leadership.

FBI agents presented cooperating business owners with secret agreements to “rent” their facilities for nuclear war. Lengthy addendums to the contracts outlined required utility and infrastructure upgrades needed to support crisis operations, the costs of which were fully paid by the government, as were separate telephone lines installed at each facility. The government also paid a token annual fee on the order of $1,000 or $2,500 to ease cooperation. During an emergency, the FBI would also pay a daily fee for each day it occupied the facility. Nowhere was any government agency other than the FBI mentioned—FEMA kept its fingerprints far from the program.

The American Camp Association which is “a community of camp professionals who, for over 100 years, have joined together to share our knowledge and experience and to ensure the quality of camp programs. Because of our diverse 11,000 plus membership and our exceptional programs, children and adults have the opportunity to learn powerful lessons in community, character-building, skill development, and healthy living — lessons that can be learned nowhere else”  has posted this notice on their website:

Under the Crisis Relocation Plan, nearly half the American population would be evacuated out of 400 “high-risk” cities into smaller surrounding towns and these preselected buildings; under FEMA’s estimates, some 65 percent of that population could be evacuated in as little as one day and fully 95 percent could be evacuated in three days. Such strategic warning, FEMA estimated, would be achievable under most circumstances, since it was “more likely that [a nuclear attack] would follow a period of intense international tension.”

Lets’s rewind back to World War II where Japanese Americans in the United States were forced to relocate and were  incarcerated in camps in the western interior of the country.  President Roosevelt authorized the deportation and incarceration with Executive Order 9066, issued on February 19, 1942, which allowed regional military commanders to designate “military areas” from which “any or all persons may be excluded”.  This authority was used to declare that all people of Japanese ancestry were excluded from the West Coast, including all of California and parts of Oregon, Washington, and Arizona, except for those in government camps.

The internment of Japanese Americans in the United States during World War II was the forced relocation and incarceration in camps in the western interior of the country of between 110,000 and 120,000 people of Japanese ancestry, most of whom lived on the Pacific coast.

Several concerns over the loyalty of ethnic Japanese seemed to stem from racial prejudice rather than any evidence of malfeasance. Major Karl Bendetsen and Lieutenant General John L. DeWitt, head of the Western Command, each questioned Japanese-American loyalty. DeWitt, who administered the internment program, repeatedly told newspapers that “A Jap’s a Jap” and testified to Congress, “I don’t want any of them [persons of Japanese ancestry] here. They are a dangerous element. There is no way to determine their loyalty… It makes no difference whether he is an American citizen, he is still a Japanese. American citizenship does not necessarily determine loyalty… But we must worry about the Japanese all the time until he is wiped off the map”.   Those who were as little as 1/16 Japanese could be placed in internment camps.  There is evidence supporting the argument that the measures were racially motivated, rather than a military necessity. Bendetsen, promoted to colonel, said in 1942 “I am determined that if they have one drop of Japanese blood in them, they must go to camp.”

Throughout many camps, twenty-five people were forced to live in space built to contain four, leaving no room for privacy.  Armed guards were posted at the camps, which were all in remote, desolate areas far from population centers. Internees were typically allowed to stay with their families, and were treated decently unless they violated the rules. There are documented instances of guards shooting internees who reportedly attempted to walk outside the fences.

In early 1943, War Relocation Authority officials, working with the War Department and the Office of Naval Intelligence circulated a questionnaire in an attempt to determine the loyalty of incarcerated Nisei men they hoped to recruit into military service.

The final two questions on the form, which soon came to be known as the “loyalty questionnaire,” were more direct:

Question 27: Are you willing to serve in the armed forces of the United States on combat duty, wherever ordered?

Question 28: Will you swear unqualified allegiances to the United States of America and faithfully defend the United States from any and all attack by foreign or domestic forces, and forswear any form of allegiance or obedience to the Japanese emperor, or other foreign government, power or organization?

Across the camps, persons who answered No to both questions became known as “No Nos.” On July 15, 1943, Tule Lake, the site with the highest number of “no” responses to the questionnaire, was designated to house inmates whose answers suggested they were “disloyal”.[129] During the remainder of 1943 and into early 1944, more than 12,000 men, women and children were transferred from other camps to the maximum-security Tule Lake Segregation Center.

On December 18, 1944, the Supreme Court handed down two decisions on the legality of the incarceration under Executive Order 9066.  These rulings stated that, in general, the removal of Japanese Americans from the West Coast was constitutional. However, Ex parte Endo unanimously declared that loyal citizens of the United States, regardless of cultural descent, could not be detained without cause. In effect, the two rulings held that, while the eviction of U.S. citizens in the name of military necessity was legal, the subsequent incarceration was not—thus paving the way for their release.

In 1988, U.S. President Ronald Reagan signed the Civil Liberties Act of 1988.  It provided financial redress of $20,000 for each surviving detainee, totaling $1.2 billion. The question of to whom reparations should be given, how much, and even whether monetary reparations were appropriate were subjects of sometimes contentious debate within the Japanese American community and Congress.

On September 27, 1992, the Civil Liberties Act Amendments of 1992, appropriating an additional $400 million to ensure all remaining internees received their $20,000 redress payments, was signed into law by President George H. W. Bush. He issued another formal apology from the U.S. government on December 7, 1991, on the 50th-Anniversary of the Pearl Harbor attack, saying:

“In remembering, it is important to come to grips with the past. No nation can fully understand itself or find its place in the world if it does not look with clear eyes at all the glories and disgraces of its past. We in the United States acknowledge such an injustice in our history. The internment of Americans of Japanese ancestry was a great injustice, and it will never be repeated.”

Over 81,800 people were qualified by 1998 and $1.6 billion was distributed among them.

At the same time in the 1940’s Nazi Germany maintained concentration camps throughout the territories it controlled before and during the Second World War. The first Nazi camps were erected in Germany in March 1933 immediately after Hitler became Chancellor and his Nazi Party was given control of the police by Reich Interior Minister Wilhelm Frick and Prussian Acting Interior Minister Hermann Göring. Used to hold and torture political opponents and union organizers, the camps initially held around 45,000 prisoners.   After September 1939, with the beginning of the Second World War, concentration camps became places where millions of ordinary people were enslaved as part of the war effort, often starved, tortured and killed.  During the war, new Nazi concentration camps for “undesirables” spread throughout the continent. 

Use of the word “concentration” came from the idea of confining people in one place because they belong to a group that is considered undesirable in some way. The term itself originated in 1897 when the “reconcentration camps” were set up in Cuba. In the past, the U.S. government had used concentration camps against Native Americans and the British had also used them during the Second Boer War. Between 1904 and 1908, the Schutztruppe of the Imperial German Army operated concentration camps in German South-West Africa (now Namibia) as part of its genocide of the Herero and Namaqua peoples.

Many of the prisoners died in the concentration camps due to deliberate maltreatment, disease, starvation, and overwork, or they were executed as unfit for labor. Prisoners were transported in inhumane conditions by rail freight cars, in which many died before reaching their final destination. The prisoners were confined in the boxcars for days or even weeks, with little or no food or water. Many died of dehydration in the intense heat of summer or froze to death in winter. Concentration camps also existed in Germany itself, and while they were not specifically designed for systematic extermination, many of their inmates perished because of harsh conditions or they were executed.The camps were liberated by the Allied forces between 1944 and 1945. Currently, there are memorials to the victims of both Nazi and communist camps at Potulice as well as across the world, they have helped to enable a German-Polish discussion on historical perceptions of World War II.

Don’t End Up in FEMA

With all the different things going on in the United States to cause racial division and civil unrest including political dissension reaching the NFL and the entertainment arena, we have to be wise and pay attention to the words, games and issues that they will use to cause division within our communities and among our peoples.  Once they feel they have a clear justified reason: with the stroke of a pen by means of executive order you will end up in a Federally Managed Cams where they will detain you and do whatever they feel necessary regardless of what rights you think you have.  Any violations of your “human rights” will be figured out 50 years later in a federal court.

Currently at the helm of The United States and as the Commander in Chief of the military is a trigger happy president. ( If you think im exaggerating then you may not have heard about him dropping the “Mother of all Bombs” on Afghanistan after 4 months of being in office.  Or sending in “Federal help” to combat Chicago gun violence)  He has absolutely no problem using the military or federal resources to “keep things under control” nor does he have any problems signing executive orders that are discriminatory in manner or that fall outside the lines of the law.  Using the entertainment arena to cause racial division and upset withing the country in hopes to lead the people into mass unrest and violence will give him the justification he needs t declare an emergency across the United States,  enact the King Alfred Plan and send whomever they deem to be a threat and or “the minority and minority supporters”  to military controlled camps FEMA camps or whatever other kinda camp they want to call it.

Be Wise Be Careful and Be Safe

What is The Will of God

What is the Will of God?

Many teach that the will of God is simply what He wants everyone on earth to do and that it is written in the Bible. While this is partially correct, it is not the full picture. When we study the Scriptures, we see that God is described as both the Righteous Judge of the earth and the Father of His children. A judge enforces the law and executes judgment, while a father leaves an inheritance for his heirs. This means that God’s will is not only His commandments and desires for how we should live but also His legally binding testament, which details the inheritance of His children.

God as the Righteous Judge

A judge enforces laws and ensures that legal wills are executed properly. The Bible confirms that God is the Supreme Judge over the earth:

  • Genesis 18:25 – “Shall not the Judge of all the earth do right?”
  • Psalm 75:7 – “But God is the Judge: He puts down one and exalts another.”
  • Isaiah 33:22 – “For the Lord is our judge, the Lord is our lawgiver, the Lord is our king; He will save us.”

As the Supreme Judge, God determines who will receive His inheritance and who will be disqualified.

God as a Father – The One Who Leaves a Will and Testament

A loving father does not depart without leaving an inheritance and clear instructions for his children. The Bible confirms that God is our Father:

  • Deuteronomy 32:6 – “Is He not your Father who created you?”
  • 2 Corinthians 6:18 – “I will be a Father to you, and you shall be My sons and daughters, says the Lord Almighty.”
  • Romans 8:16-17 – “The Spirit bears witness that we are children of God, and if children, then heirs—heirs of God and joint heirs with Christ.”

As our Father, God has written a legally binding will (His covenant) that determines what His children will inherit.

What Is Written in God’s Will?

A. The Inheritance for His Children

God’s testament promises specific blessings to His faithful children:

  • Land – The promised land (Genesis 17:8, Psalm 37:29).
  • Rulership – Authority over the nations (Daniel 7:27, Revelation 5:10).
  • Eternal Life – Immortality in His Kingdom (John 3:16, 1 Corinthians 15:50-52).
  • God’s Presence – A restored relationship with Him (Ezekiel 37:27, Revelation 21:3).

This inheritance is only given to those who meet the conditions set in God’s will.

B. The Legal Terms of the Will

Like any legal document, God’s will has conditions:

  1. Obedience to God’s Law
    • Exodus 19:5 – “If you obey My voice and keep My covenant, you shall be My treasured possession.”
    • Revelation 22:14 – “Blessed are those who do His commandments, that they may have the right to the tree of life.”
  2. Endurance to the End
    • Matthew 24:13 – “He who endures to the end shall be saved.”
    • Revelation 2:26 – “He who overcomes and keeps My works until the end, I will give power over the nations.”

Not everyone will inherit the promises—only those who obey the terms of the will.

Judah’s Inheritance is Promised and Cannot Be Erased

The tribe of Judah was chosen for leadership and rulership among the twelve tribes of Israel:

  • Genesis 49:8-10“Judah, you are he whom your brothers shall praise; your hand shall be on the neck of your enemies… The scepter shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh comes.”
  • Psalm 60:7“Judah is My lawgiver.”

🔹 Implication: The leadership and rulership aspect of Judah’s inheritance is still intact. Judah is the tribe destined to govern, teach the law, and guide Israel. Despite captivity, oppression, and dispersion, God’s promise has not changed—the rightful inheritance remains.


Judah Must Awaken and Reclaim Their True Identity

One of the greatest attacks on Judah has been identity theft and miseducation. The prophecy in Deuteronomy speaks of Judah and Israel forgetting their heritage:

  • Deuteronomy 28:64“And the Lord shall scatter you among all people, from one end of the earth to the other…”
  • Jeremiah 17:4“And you, even yourself, shall discontinue from your heritage that I gave you.”

This prophecy describes the loss of identity among the children of Judah, particularly in the lands where they were sold and scattered.

🔹 Implication: The Royal Awakening is essential! The children of Judah must reclaim their identity, history, and culture as God’s chosen people, rather than accept the false narratives imposed upon them. The inheritance belongs to those who know they are heirs!


Judah Must Return to Covenant Obedience

As God’s lawgiver and leaders, Judah is responsible for upholding the covenant. However, the curses in Deuteronomy 28 were the result of breaking the terms of God’s will.

  • Hosea 4:6“My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge. Because you have rejected knowledge, I also will reject you from being priest for Me.”
  • Isaiah 1:3“The ox knows its owner and the donkey its master’s crib; but Israel does not know, My people do not consider.”

🔹 Implication: To restore the inheritance, Judah must return to the covenant—this means keeping the commandments, observing the holy days, and separating from Babylonian customs. This is part of fulfilling the terms of God’s will to receive the promised inheritance.


Judah’s Role in the Kingdom and the Coming Judgment

The will of God includes a future kingdom where Yahusha HaMashiach (Christ) will reign as King, and Judah has a special role in this government.

  • Zechariah 12:7“The Lord shall save the tents of Judah first.”
  • Obadiah 1:21“And saviors shall come up on Mount Zion to judge the mount of Esau; and the kingdom shall be the Lord’s.”
  • Revelation 5:5“Behold, the Lion of the tribe of Judah, the Root of David, has prevailed.”

🔹 Implication: Judah’s awakening is the beginning of the restoration of Israel. The kingdom will not be established without Judah playing their role. Judah must prepare now—not just spiritually but also mentally, physically, and communally—to govern righteously.


Judah Must Separate from Babylon and Lead in Righteousness

  • Jeremiah 51:6“Flee out of the midst of Babylon, and deliver every man his soul: be not cut off in her iniquity.”
  • Micah 5:8“And the remnant of Jacob shall be among the Gentiles in the midst of many peoples like a lion among the beasts of the forest.”

🔹 Implication: Judah must come out of false doctrines, pagan traditions, and the world’s system to stand as the righteous remnant. The Royal Awakening is about restoring the law, order, and kingdom structure that was lost through centuries of captivity and deception.

How to Prepare to Receive God’s Inheritance

To claim an inheritance, heirs must be prepared. Here’s how we can position ourselves to receive God’s promises:

1. Establish Your Identity as an Heir

  • Study the Scriptures to understand your heritage and divine calling (Deuteronomy 7:6, Isaiah 44:1).

2. Separate from the World’s System

  • 2 Corinthians 6:17 – “Come out from among them and be separate, says the Lord.”
  • 1 John 2:15 – “Do not love the world or the things in the world.”
  • Remove pagan traditions, avoid worldly distractions, and focus on righteous living.

3. Walk in Righteousness and Holiness

  • Leviticus 20:26 – “You shall be holy to Me, for I the Lord am holy, and have separated you from the peoples, that you should be Mine.”
  • Ephesians 4:24 – “Put on the new self, created to be like God in true righteousness and holiness.”
  • Live a set-apart life, guarding your actions, speech, and thoughts.

4. Store Up Treasures in Heaven (Kingdom Investments)

  • Matthew 6:19-20 – “Do not lay up for yourselves treasures on earth… but lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven.”
  • Luke 12:33 – “Sell what you have and give to the poor; provide yourselves money bags which do not grow old, a treasure in the heavens.”
  • Use your time, resources, and skills to build God’s Kingdom—teach, help others, and grow spiritually.

5. Prepare for the Coming Kingdom

  • Matthew 24:44 – “Be ready, for the Son of Man is coming at an hour you do not expect.”
  • Revelation 21:7 – “He who overcomes shall inherit all things, and I will be his God and he shall be My son.”
  • Stay watchful, pray, fast, and prepare for the return of the Messiah.

 

The Great Gay Debate… The Damned Homosexuals

The debate surrounding homosexuality and its perceived condemnation remains a highly contentious issue among churches, religious followers, and even within the government. These discussions often revolve around biblical interpretations, particularly verses such as Leviticus 18:22: “Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.” As a result, many condemn homosexuality, sometimes focusing solely on it as a sin above others.

In response, some churches, camps, and programs have been established with the goal of “praying the gay away,” based on the belief that homosexuality is not innate but rather the result of demonic possession or personal choice. Additionally, some argue that God despises homosexuality, citing the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah as divine punishment for such behavior. Common phrases like “God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve” and “Man is meant to be fruitful and multiply” are used to argue that homosexuality contradicts nature, and therefore, defies God’s design.

Now, let us examine these references in their full context to uncover the truth of these matters and discern what God truly says about them.

Before we examine the scriptures, it’s important to clarify a key distinction: there is a significant difference between being gay and being a homosexual.

The term homosexual originated in the English language in the 19th century and is used to describe someone who engages in sexual relations with the same gender. Because the word itself contains “sex,” the emphasis is often placed on the act of sex. However, many people labeled as homosexual may choose not to engage in sexual acts for various reasons, such as personal convictions, lack of desire, concerns about disease, or societal pressures.

In contrast, the word gay refers to a person who experiences romantic or emotional attraction toward the same gender. The term has much older roots, dating back to before the 14th century in archaic French. Interestingly, when translated into Hebrew, gay corresponds to the term homo, meaning “same” or “uniform.” The concept of homogenization refers to making something uniform or blending diverse elements into one. By contrast, reverse homogenization separates a uniform structure into distinct parts.

A biblical example of these concepts can be seen in the creation of Adam and Eve. In the beginning, God created Adam alone—there was no Adam and Eve or Adam and Steve, only Adam and God. Genesis 2:7 states:

“And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.”

Adam existed as a singular being (homogenized), fulfilling the role God assigned to him. However, God declared that it was not good for man to be alone and decided to create a suitable helper. After forming all the animals, none were found to be an appropriate companion. Then, in Genesis 2:21-22:

“And the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof; And the rib, which the Lord God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.”

Here, God took a part of Adam and made it into a separate being—this is reverse homogenization, where one uniform structure was divided into two distinct parts. Yet, in Genesis 2:24, the two were meant to reunite:

“Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.”

This represents re-homogenization, where the two distinct parts come together again as one. If God originally made one and then separated it into two, is He not also capable of placing the balance of two within one, just as it was in the beginning?

By definition, eunuchs were individuals who, for various reasons—biological or social—did not engage in traditional heterosexual relationships. In today’s terms, this could be compared to those who identify as gay or homosexual, as society often labels individuals based on their deviation from expected norms of attraction and procreation.

What Does God Say About Eunuchs?

Rather than condemning eunuchs, God acknowledges and honors them:

Isaiah 56:4-5
“For thus saith the Lord unto the eunuchs that keep my sabbaths, and choose the things that please me, and take hold of my covenant; Even unto them will I give in mine house and within my walls a place and a name better than of sons and of daughters: I will give them an everlasting name, that shall not be cut off.”

This passage shows that God values those who are faithful to Him, regardless of their status or ability to procreate. He promises them a place of honor, even greater than that of traditional family lineage.

Acts 8:36-38
“And as they went on their way, they came unto a certain water: and the eunuch said, See, here is water; what doth hinder me to be baptized? And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God. And he commanded the chariot to stand still: and they went down both into the water, both Philip and the eunuch; and he baptized him.”

This account reinforces that eunuchs were fully accepted into the faith. God and The Bible does not condemn eunuchs—instead, God acknowledges their existence, grants them a place of honor, and welcomes them into His covenant.

 

Born That Way

The term gay describes the natural disposition of a person such as a eunuch. In Matthew 19:11-12, Jesus speaks about different types of eunuchs:

Matthew 19:11-12
“But he said unto them, All men cannot receive this saying, save they to whom it is given. For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother’s womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven’s sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.”

Understanding Eunuchs

Historically, the term eunuch referred to men who had been castrated, usually at a young age, which affected their hormonal development. However, in ancient texts, the term was also used to describe men who were impotent, celibate, or simply not inclined to marry and have children.

Eunuchs were often employed in royal courts and harems as servants or guards because they were considered trustworthy and had no personal ties to aristocratic families. Many societies believed eunuchs lacked the same desires and ambitions as other men, making them more reliable in certain roles. The Byzantine Emperor Leo VI even banned eunuchs from marrying in the 9th century, reinforcing the idea that they were not meant for traditional male-female relationships.

What About  Sodom and Gomorrah?

Many people believe that Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed solely because of homosexuality, but the Bible provides a much broader explanation of their wickedness.

What Does the Bible Say?

Ezekiel 16:48-50 clearly outlines the sins of Sodom:

Ezekiel 16:48-50
“As I live, saith the Lord God, Sodom thy sister hath not done, she nor her daughters, as thou hast done, thou and thy daughters. Behold, this was the iniquity of thy sister Sodom: pride, fullness of bread, and abundance of idleness was in her and in her daughters, neither did she strengthen the hand of the poor and needy. And they were haughty, and committed abomination before me: therefore I took them away as I saw good.”

This passage highlights pride, greed, laziness, mistreatment of the poor, arrogance, and abominations as the key reasons for their destruction. There is no mention of homosexuality as the primary sin.

What Does the Book of Jasher Say?

The Book of Jasher (or Sefer haYashar), an ancient text referenced in Joshua and 2 Samuel, gives additional insight into the extreme wickedness of Sodom and Gomorrah. Chapter 19 describes how these cities were brutal, inhumane, and merciless, particularly toward the poor and outsiders.

Examples of Their Wickedness:

  • A poor man was secretly given food. When the people found out, they burned alive the woman who helped him.
  • A traveler was given food and water by a kind young woman. As punishment, the people covered her in honey and let bees sting her to death.

These laws didn’t just permit evil—they punished kindness.

The Truth About “Bedding” in Sodom and Gomorrah

Many people focus on the attempted assault of Lot’s angelic guests as proof that Sodom’s sin was homosexuality. Genesis 19

But before they lay down, the men of the city, even the men of Sodom, compassed the house round, both old and young, all the people from every quarter:

And they called unto Lot, and said unto him, Where are the men which came in to thee this night? bring them out unto us, that we may know them.

However, the Book of Jasher explains that “bedding” was a cruel form of torture and humiliation used against outsiders, not an act of love or attraction.

Jasher 19:3-7 describes their sadistic practice:

  • The cities had special torture beds in the streets.
  • If a man arrived in town, the people would force him onto a bed.
  • If he was too short, they would stretch him until he nearly died.
  • If he was too tall, they would crush him until he was near death.
  • When victims cried out for help, the people mocked them, saying, “Thus shall it be done to a man that cometh into our land.”

 

  •  

This was not about sexual desire—it was about power, cruelty, and humiliation.

Why Did God Destroy Sodom and Gomorrah?

The wickedness of these cities went far beyond one sin. They were corrupt, heartless, and completely devoid of mercy. Their actions provoked God’s judgment, as Jasher 19:44 states:

Jasher 19:44
“And the Lord was provoked at this and at all the works of the cities of Sodom, for they had abundance of food, and had tranquility amongst them, and still would not sustain the poor and the needy, and in those days their evil doings and sins became great before the Lord.”

This perfectly aligns with Ezekiel 16:48-50, showing that their destruction was due to their pride, greed, oppression of the poor, and extreme wickedness—not simply because of homosexuality.

Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed because they were a lawless, merciless society that thrived on cruelty and injustice. The idea that their downfall was solely due to homosexuality is an oversimplification that ignores the full biblical and historical context.

The real lesson from Sodom and Gomorrah is that God despises oppression, injustice, and a lack of compassion—and that when a society reaches a certain level of wickedness, divine judgment follows.

Gays Don’t Procreate, You’re Supposed to be Fruitful and Multiply!

Some argue that same-sex relationships go against God’s command to “be fruitful and multiply” since they cannot naturally produce children. However, a closer look at the Bible reveals that this command was not universally given to all people at all times.

Was “Be Fruitful and Multiply” Given to Adam and Eve?

Contrary to popular belief, God did not issue the command to be fruitful and multiply to Adam and Eve after they were expelled from the Garden of Eden. Instead, He pronounced curses upon them due to their disobedience:

  • The Serpent was cursed to crawl on its belly and live in enmity with humanity (Genesis 3:14-15).
  • Eve was cursed with pain in childbirth and subjugation to her husband (Genesis 3:16).
  • Adam was cursed with toil and hardship in working the land (Genesis 3:17-19).
  • Both were expelled from the Garden and forced to live in a fallen world (Genesis 3:23).

Nowhere in this passage does God command them to multiply.

Who Was Commanded to Multiply?

The command to be fruitful and multiply was later given to Noah and his sons after the flood:

Genesis 9:1
“And God blessed Noah and his sons, and said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth.”

This command was given in a specific context—to repopulate the earth after its destruction. It was not a blanket command for all people in all circumstances.

God Decides When and With Whom to Bring Forth Children

Throughout Scripture, we see that God not only commands people to have children at certain times but also prohibits it in others:

  • God directed Abraham’s servant to find a wife for Isaac from a specific lineage (Genesis 24:7).
  • God commanded Jeremiah not to marry or have children because of the coming judgment upon the land (Jeremiah 16:1-4).

This shows that procreation is not simply a matter of nature—it is directed by God’s wisdom and timing.

God’s Sovereignty Over Creation

God, who created the heavens and the earth, is in full control over life and its continuation. He has the power to give and take away:

  • He made a donkey speak (Numbers 22:28).
  • He commands the stars to shine or fall (Job 38:31-33).
  • He can stop or allow life to be produced according to His will.

If God commands the stars to fall, will they not obey? If He commands mankind to cease producing, will mankind not also obey?

Who art thou O’ Son of Man?

Matthew 16:14 And they said, Some say that thou art John the Baptist: some, Elias; and others, Jeremias, or one of the prophets. 15 He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am?16 And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.17 And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven.

Now many preach that this is Jesus confirming that everything Peter has said was true and was revealed to him by God.”  But lets look at exactly what Jesus says both before and after this piece:

Romans 16:13 When Jesus came into the coasts of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, saying, “Whom do men say that I the Son of man am?”

He then says in response to Peter  17… “for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven.”  20 Then charged he his disciples that they should tell no man that he was Jesus the Christ. When Jesus first poses the question he asks “who do people say that I the son of man am?”  He refers to himself as the son of man. Proverbs 8:4 Unto you, O men, I call; and my voice is to the sons of man. Ezekiel 2:2 And he said unto me, Son of man, stand upon thy feet, and I will speak unto thee.2 And the spirit entered into me when he spake unto me, and set me upon my feet, that I heard him that spake unto me.3 And he said unto me, Son of man, I send thee to the children of Israel, to a rebellious nation that hath rebelled against me: they and their fathers have transgressed against me, even unto this very day.For they are impudent children and stiffhearted. I do send thee unto them; and thou shalt say unto them, Thus saith the Lord God.5 And they, whether they will hear, or whether they will forbear, (for they are a rebellious house,) yet shall know that there hath been a prophet among them.And thou, son of man, be not afraid of them, neither be afraid of their words, though briers and thorns be with thee, and thou dost dwell among scorpions: be not afraid of their words, nor be dismayed at their looks, though they be a rebellious house.7 And thou shalt speak my words unto them, whether they will hear, or whether they will forbear: for they are most rebellious.8 But thou, son of man, hear what I say unto thee; Be not thou rebellious like that rebellious house: open thy mouth, and eat that I give thee.9 And when I looked, behold, an hand was sent unto me; and, lo, a roll of a book was therein;10 And he spread it before me; and it was written within and without: and there was written therein lamentations, and mourning, and woe. Ecclesiastes 1:13 And I gave my heart to seek and search out by wisdom concerning all things that are done under heaven: this sore travail hath God given to the sons of man to be exercised therewith.  When speaking to certain prophets in the old testament of the Bible God would call them Son of man, and give the sons of men different charges, things to say and things to do.  

People Watching a Movie

After that it says  20 Then charged he his disciples that they should tell no man that he was Jesus the Christ.

 

Flirst is a collage artist who assembles disparate pieces to explore how he can change the harmony of the whole. For my poster, a homage to The Revenant, I assembled pieces to create a vast, sinister, and lonely landscape. The poster features a figure with very few people on his side; this represents the film’s main character, Hugh Glass, who was brutally attacked by a bear and left for dead in the winter wilderness.

I wanted to portray the same witty chaotic vibe in my poster

In his Barcelona series, Mario Corea Aiello forms a grungy collage of newspaper and magazine cutouts and heavy paint strokes. I felt this style would parallel the vicious storm that left Mark Watney for dead on Mars in The Martian. For the color scheme, I deferred to Eric White’s cover art from the original novel by Andy Weir to capture the characteristics of an otherworldly storm.

My inspiration for this poster is one part Roy Lichtenstein and one part Stefan Sagmeister. Spotlight is about journalists uncovering a massive scandal in one of Boston’s oldest institutions, and I found that the perfectly contradictory homophone pray/prey encapsulates the shock and horror felt by the community when this scandal was made public.

To illustrate this, I pixelated an image of a priest, then tore off his head and replaced it with an image of a wolf. I looked to Warhol’s subversive dictator portraits to shape this poster of Immortan Joe.Warhol had a remarkable ability to distract from the meaning of his art. On the surface his work simply looks cool!

This shallow analysis misses the irony behind his cultural representations. Mad Max: Fury Road has the same effect: The stylized nature of the film gets more attention than the meaning behind it.

I chose to feature Immortan Joe because he is a terrible person, but his iconic look makes him instantly recognizable. When I first read the plot summary for Room, I envisioned lonely, sterile characters, who had been institutionalized by their secluded environment.

Of course, when I saw the movie that perception quickly changed; the characters are full of life, love, and joy, and the audience instantly empathizes with them on a raw, human level. KAWS statues play on a similar deceit. Initially they have a sterile, robotic feel, but when you view them in their human-scale sizes and see their playful aesthetic, you experience an unexpected sense of connection.

Welcome to the Oscars, Or as some people like to call it, the white people’s choice awards

The Big Short takes a comedic approach to a dark subject, and I wanted to portray the same witty, chaotic vibe in my poster. Keith Haring was my inspiration because his high-contrast, brightly colored political work, which touches on grim subjects like rape, death, and war, hinges on the same contrast as the film. The poster is based on the film’s alligator-in-an-abandoned-pool scene; the alligator represents the main characters in the movie, who took advantage of the 2008 housing bubble and left the world in desperation when it burst.

Backstage Preparations

I chose to focus on the muddy gray areas and loopholes within Bridge of Spies. The Cold War was fueled by each side’s increasingly dire hypotheticals, causing mass paranoia among citizens and governments alike.

A large part of the film’s narrative focuses on the extent of protection under the law, especially for a Soviet spy. I reimagined Lady Justice, mixing her blindfold with the American and Soviet flags to represent how both countries were tied to their individuals principles of justice even while locked in an unending battle for the upper hand. Set in the eponymous 1950s borough, Brooklyn features then-contemporary imagery that now exemplifies the commodification of Brooklyn as a global brand.

Just as the Pop Art movement utilized mass advertising and irony to re-contextualize commercial art, I drew from today’s vintage, artisanal design trends, which are inspired by that era and setting. In that vein, I applied the animated footage and vector elements to illustrate how the contrasting settings of Brooklyn and Ireland re-contextualized the protagonist’s identity through a fluctuating sense of home.

The 88th annual Academy Awards are underway, and viewers are anxiously awaiting the ceremony to find out if their favorite flicks and actors win, which categories will see big upsets, and which speeches and performances will stand out.

Not to mention how host Chris Rock will approach the Oscars So White controversy, and who he will target during the opening monologue. Did Leo finally take home a golden statue? The buzz began during the red carpet events prior to the official event. Jennifer Jason Leigh, nominated for Best Actress in a Supporting Role for The Hateful Eight, seemed slightly out of it during her interview with Ryan Seacrest on E!’s special. But arguably the biggest surprise was Best Actor nominee Leonardo DiCaprio (The Revenant).

If hosts were nominated, I wouldn’t be here; instead, you’d have Neil Patrick Harris.

Rock, who addressed the issues with ease and expected humor, added that he did seriously consider quitting after so many people spoke out and pressured him to do so. But the last thing I need is to lose another job to Kevin Hart, he said, as the crowd erupted in laughter (including Hart himself, who was in the audience).

Arguably, the best part of Rock’s monologue was his blatant dig at Jada Pinkett-Smith and her vocal boycott of the Oscars. Isn’t she on a TV show? Jada boycotting the Oscars is like me boycotting Rihanna’s panties, he said.

Scroll to top