Hidden Knowledge

0
Hidden Knowledge Life Religion & Spirituality

Darkness and its Kingdom

By atlcustoms — 3 days ago

Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

Genesis 1:2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.

Here we have two entities identified “darkness upon the face of the deep” and “the spirit of God” moving upon the face of the waters. Darkness existed with God in the beginning. Darkness is just as real as God.  And then…

Genesis 1:3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light….

We all know that where there is light, darkness does not exist, and that if you want to get rid of darkness; you turn on the lights.  Light is the enemy of darkness.  When God said let there be light, darkness received this as an attack on its  existence.  Everything within that light, and everything created with that light became the enemy of darkness simply because it could not exist in that light and because of Good’s creation.  God knew this when subsequently in Genesis 1:4 … God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness.  God not only separates the light from darkness, but notice how He calls the light good, but does not denote the same for the darkness that was separated.  Because it was not good and did not/would not have good intentions for His creation.  Why? Because again, through this creation darkness is being eradicated.   

This is when the war began.  

Revelation 12:6-8 “ And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels, 8 And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven.”

We know that God continued establishing His creation and kingdom filling it with plants, trees, animals, man and more.  All created in light.  Imagine being “darkness”, and all of a sudden out of nowhere “light” turns on. Immediately destroying whatever parts of you it touches. You only now exist in the shadows and in the far nethers (outer realm ) where the light does not reach. After recognizing what it is destroying you and eradicating your existence you are going to begin almost immediately trying to destroy, turn off or snuff out “the light” or whatever was created so that you can continue to exist as you were before the lights were turned on.  Therefore darkness began establishing its kingdom set to destroy God’s creation.  

The Kingdom of Darkness

In order to recognize and identify darkness as an entity and its established kingdom, we need to identify and recognize its traits and characteristics.   One thing we know about darkness is it loves to hide things and keep things hidden and in secret.  Darkness likes for things to be blinded and not able to see.  Darkness creeps in through cracks and shadows.  Darkness can not STAND light or anything created in it and seeks to destroy it by any and all means possible.  Keep these traits of darkness in mind when identifying darkness and its kingdom.  

Ever hear of dark magic? The dark arts? Consorting with the dark lord? Prince of darkness? What about the occult (hidden)? Shadow government?  These are all means of which darkness establishes and works within, moves through and establishes its kingdom within God’s creation.  Ephesians 6:12: “For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.”  The same way God moves and communicates in spirit with his kingdom, darkness communes with those who are established in its kingdom.  When they communicate, develop plans and implement them it is all done with the goal of keeping things and people in the dark, keeping them blind, keeping things hidden and ultimately destroying God’s creation.

Job 5:12-14 He disappointeth the devices of the crafty, so that their hands cannot perform their enterprise.  13 He taketh the wise in their own craftiness: and the counsel of the froward is carried headlong.  14 They meet with darkness in the day time, and grope in the noonday as in the night.

Proverbs 4:19 The way of the wicked is as darkness: they know not at what they stumble.

Children of Darkness

We know that on the sixth day after “letting there be light” God created Adam, also known as man.  Adam and his children being created in light also became known as the children of light.  1 Thessalonians 5:5 “Ye are all the children of light, and the children of the day: we are not of the night, nor of darkness.”  At that time darkness began conspiring with the Angels to make their own children  Genesis 6:4,  “There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown”.  Jude 6:1 “And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.”  These angels were led by the prince of the kingdom of darkness, aka The Prince of Darkness and a bunch of other aliases ie. Satan, Semyaza, Samael  Revelation 12:9 “ And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.”  These children were made to: steal everything made for God’s children from God’s children, kill God’s children and destroy God’s creation.  John 10:10 The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy

Enoch 6-11 Fragment from the Book of Noah

John 8:44 “Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. ” 

Children of Light

God who was there in the beginning and who has seen everything that has happened; knows everything that has been done.  Even if his children and creation did not know or understand; God always has.

Matthew 13:24-30 “Another parable put he forth unto them, saying, The kingdom of heaven is likened unto a man which sowed good seed in his field:  25 But while men slept, his enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat, and went his way.  26 But when the blade was sprung up, and brought forth fruit, then appeared the tares also.  27 So the servants of the householder came and said unto him, Sir, didst not thou sow good seed in thy field? from whence then hath it tares?  28 He said unto them, An enemy hath done this. The servants said unto him, Wilt thou then that we go and gather them up?  29 But he said, Nay; lest while ye gather up the tares, ye root up also the wheat with them.  30 Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn.”

Matthew 13:36-43 “Then Jesus sent the multitude away, and went into the house: and his disciples came unto him, saying, Declare unto us the parable of the tares of the field.  37 He answered and said unto them, He that soweth the good seed is the Son of man;  38 The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one;  39 The enemy that sowed them is the devil; the harvest is the end of the world; and the reapers are the angels.  40 As therefore the tares are gathered and burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this world.  41 The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity;  42 And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.  43 Then shall the righteous shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.”

He sends us messages, warning, instruction and promise through His messengers, His will and our inheritance.  Isaiah 45:3 “And I will give thee the treasures of darkness, and hidden riches of secret places, that thou mayest know that I, the Lord, which call thee by thy name, am the God of Israel.”  Acts 26:18 “To open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me.” Ephesians 5:11 “And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them.” John 8:12 “Then spake Jesus again unto them, saying, I am the light of the world: he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life.”

Enoch 1-5 

He also sends messages and reminders of destruction to the kingdom of darkness on earth as well: Psalm 145:20 “The Lord preserveth all them that love him: but all the wicked will he destroy.

0
Family Hidden Knowledge Life Politics

FEMA Camps, Concentration Camps, Internment Camps Same Difference

By Royal Awakening — 7 years ago
With all the recent natural disasters hurricanes, wild fires and flooding hitting the United States and its territories as well as the threat of an impending war there has been a lot of activity and response by the Federal Emergency Management Agency Or FEMA. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is an arm of the United States Department of Homeland Security who’s primary purpose is to “coordinate the response to a disaster that has occurred in the United States and that overwhelms the resources of local and state authorities”.   FEMA also provides state and local governments with experts in specialized fields and funding for rebuilding efforts and relief funds for infrastructure by directing individuals to access low interest loans, in conjunction with the Small Business Administration. In addition to this, FEMA provides funds for training of response personnel throughout the United States and its territories as part of the agency’s preparedness effort. Following the September 11, 2001, attacks, Congress passed the Homeland Security Act of 2002, which created the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to better coordinate among the different federal agencies that deal with law enforcement, disaster preparedness and recovery, border protection and civil defense. FEMA was absorbed into DHS effective March 1, 2003. President George W. Bush appointed Michael D. Brown as FEMA’s director in January 2003.  Brown warned in September 2003 that FEMA’s absorption into the Department of Homeland Security would make a mockery of FEMA’s new motto, “A Nation Prepared”, and would “fundamentally sever FEMA from its core functions”, “shatter agency morale” and “break longstanding, effective and tested relationships with states and first responder stakeholders”. The inevitable result of the reorganization of 2003, warned Brown, would be “an ineffective and uncoordinated response” to a terrorist attack or a natural disaster.

FEMA

4 Videos

Well those warnings proved to be more than true when Hurricane Katrina hit the United States.   Federal funding to affected states for “all hazards” disaster preparedness needs was not awarded unless the local agencies made the purposes for the funding a “just terrorism” function.  Emergency management professionals testified that funds for preparedness for natural hazards was given LESS priority than preparations for counter terrorism measures. Testimony also expressed the opinion that the mission to mitigate vulnerability and prepare for natural hazard disasters before they occurred had been separated from disaster preparedness functions, making the nation more vulnerable to known hazards, like hurricanes.  So basically after merging the Federal Emergency Management Agency into the Department of Homeland Security; FEMA became more about “counter terrorism” and “disaster management” than about natural disaster management with them defining what a “disaster” is.


As a part of its disaster planning efforts in the 1980’s FEMA began developing what they called “Crisis Relocation Planng”.  In conjunction with the FBI they began to scout the nation’s commercial buildings for possible refugee resettlement. In Arkansas, agents lined up a meeting with Walmart executives to discuss using the company’s huge stores, explaining as a cover that they wanted to learn crisis management techniques from companies that had large centralized leadership.

FBI agents presented cooperating business owners with secret agreements to “rent” their facilities for nuclear war. Lengthy addendums to the contracts outlined required utility and infrastructure upgrades needed to support crisis operations, the costs of which were fully paid by the government, as were separate telephone lines installed at each facility. The government also paid a token annual fee on the order of $1,000 or $2,500 to ease cooperation. During an emergency, the FBI would also pay a daily fee for each day it occupied the facility. Nowhere was any government agency other than the FBI mentioned—FEMA kept its fingerprints far from the program.

The American Camp Association which is “a community of camp professionals who, for over 100 years, have joined together to share our knowledge and experience and to ensure the quality of camp programs. Because of our diverse 11,000 plus membership and our exceptional programs, children and adults have the opportunity to learn powerful lessons in community, character-building, skill development, and healthy living — lessons that can be learned nowhere else”  has posted this notice on their website:

Under the Crisis Relocation Plan, nearly half the American population would be evacuated out of 400 “high-risk” cities into smaller surrounding towns and these preselected buildings; under FEMA’s estimates, some 65 percent of that population could be evacuated in as little as one day and fully 95 percent could be evacuated in three days. Such strategic warning, FEMA estimated, would be achievable under most circumstances, since it was “more likely that [a nuclear attack] would follow a period of intense international tension.”

Lets’s rewind back to World War II where Japanese Americans in the United States were forced to relocate and were  incarcerated in camps in the western interior of the country.  President Roosevelt authorized the deportation and incarceration with Executive Order 9066, issued on February 19, 1942, which allowed regional military commanders to designate “military areas” from which “any or all persons may be excluded”.  This authority was used to declare that all people of Japanese ancestry were excluded from the West Coast, including all of California and parts of Oregon, Washington, and Arizona, except for those in government camps.

The internment of Japanese Americans in the United States during World War II was the forced relocation and incarceration in camps in the western interior of the country of between 110,000 and 120,000 people of Japanese ancestry, most of whom lived on the Pacific coast.

Several concerns over the loyalty of ethnic Japanese seemed to stem from racial prejudice rather than any evidence of malfeasance. Major Karl Bendetsen and Lieutenant General John L. DeWitt, head of the Western Command, each questioned Japanese-American loyalty. DeWitt, who administered the internment program, repeatedly told newspapers that “A Jap’s a Jap” and testified to Congress, “I don’t want any of them [persons of Japanese ancestry] here. They are a dangerous element. There is no way to determine their loyalty… It makes no difference whether he is an American citizen, he is still a Japanese. American citizenship does not necessarily determine loyalty… But we must worry about the Japanese all the time until he is wiped off the map”.   Those who were as little as 1/16 Japanese could be placed in internment camps.  There is evidence supporting the argument that the measures were racially motivated, rather than a military necessity. Bendetsen, promoted to colonel, said in 1942 “I am determined that if they have one drop of Japanese blood in them, they must go to camp.”

Throughout many camps, twenty-five people were forced to live in space built to contain four, leaving no room for privacy.  Armed guards were posted at the camps, which were all in remote, desolate areas far from population centers. Internees were typically allowed to stay with their families, and were treated decently unless they violated the rules. There are documented instances of guards shooting internees who reportedly attempted to walk outside the fences.

In early 1943, War Relocation Authority officials, working with the War Department and the Office of Naval Intelligence circulated a questionnaire in an attempt to determine the loyalty of incarcerated Nisei men they hoped to recruit into military service.

The final two questions on the form, which soon came to be known as the “loyalty questionnaire,” were more direct:

Question 27: Are you willing to serve in the armed forces of the United States on combat duty, wherever ordered?

Question 28: Will you swear unqualified allegiances to the United States of America and faithfully defend the United States from any and all attack by foreign or domestic forces, and forswear any form of allegiance or obedience to the Japanese emperor, or other foreign government, power or organization?

Across the camps, persons who answered No to both questions became known as “No Nos.” On July 15, 1943, Tule Lake, the site with the highest number of “no” responses to the questionnaire, was designated to house inmates whose answers suggested they were “disloyal”.[129] During the remainder of 1943 and into early 1944, more than 12,000 men, women and children were transferred from other camps to the maximum-security Tule Lake Segregation Center.

On December 18, 1944, the Supreme Court handed down two decisions on the legality of the incarceration under Executive Order 9066.  These rulings stated that, in general, the removal of Japanese Americans from the West Coast was constitutional. However, Ex parte Endo unanimously declared that loyal citizens of the United States, regardless of cultural descent, could not be detained without cause. In effect, the two rulings held that, while the eviction of U.S. citizens in the name of military necessity was legal, the subsequent incarceration was not—thus paving the way for their release.

In 1988, U.S. President Ronald Reagan signed the Civil Liberties Act of 1988.  It provided financial redress of $20,000 for each surviving detainee, totaling $1.2 billion. The question of to whom reparations should be given, how much, and even whether monetary reparations were appropriate were subjects of sometimes contentious debate within the Japanese American community and Congress.

On September 27, 1992, the Civil Liberties Act Amendments of 1992, appropriating an additional $400 million to ensure all remaining internees received their $20,000 redress payments, was signed into law by President George H. W. Bush. He issued another formal apology from the U.S. government on December 7, 1991, on the 50th-Anniversary of the Pearl Harbor attack, saying:

“In remembering, it is important to come to grips with the past. No nation can fully understand itself or find its place in the world if it does not look with clear eyes at all the glories and disgraces of its past. We in the United States acknowledge such an injustice in our history. The internment of Americans of Japanese ancestry was a great injustice, and it will never be repeated.”

Over 81,800 people were qualified by 1998 and $1.6 billion was distributed among them.

At the same time in the 1940’s Nazi Germany maintained concentration camps throughout the territories it controlled before and during the Second World War. The first Nazi camps were erected in Germany in March 1933 immediately after Hitler became Chancellor and his Nazi Party was given control of the police by Reich Interior Minister Wilhelm Frick and Prussian Acting Interior Minister Hermann Göring. Used to hold and torture political opponents and union organizers, the camps initially held around 45,000 prisoners.   After September 1939, with the beginning of the Second World War, concentration camps became places where millions of ordinary people were enslaved as part of the war effort, often starved, tortured and killed.  During the war, new Nazi concentration camps for “undesirables” spread throughout the continent. 

Use of the word “concentration” came from the idea of confining people in one place because they belong to a group that is considered undesirable in some way. The term itself originated in 1897 when the “reconcentration camps” were set up in Cuba. In the past, the U.S. government had used concentration camps against Native Americans and the British had also used them during the Second Boer War. Between 1904 and 1908, the Schutztruppe of the Imperial German Army operated concentration camps in German South-West Africa (now Namibia) as part of its genocide of the Herero and Namaqua peoples.

Many of the prisoners died in the concentration camps due to deliberate maltreatment, disease, starvation, and overwork, or they were executed as unfit for labor. Prisoners were transported in inhumane conditions by rail freight cars, in which many died before reaching their final destination. The prisoners were confined in the boxcars for days or even weeks, with little or no food or water. Many died of dehydration in the intense heat of summer or froze to death in winter. Concentration camps also existed in Germany itself, and while they were not specifically designed for systematic extermination, many of their inmates perished because of harsh conditions or they were executed.The camps were liberated by the Allied forces between 1944 and 1945. Currently, there are memorials to the victims of both Nazi and communist camps at Potulice as well as across the world, they have helped to enable a German-Polish discussion on historical perceptions of World War II.

Don’t End Up in FEMA

With all the different things going on in the United States to cause racial division and civil unrest including political dissension reaching the NFL and the entertainment arena, we have to be wise and pay attention to the words, games and issues that they will use to cause division within our communities and among our peoples.  Once they feel they have a clear justified reason: with the stroke of a pen by means of executive order you will end up in a Federally Managed Cams where they will detain you and do whatever they feel necessary regardless of what rights you think you have.  Any violations of your “human rights” will be figured out 50 years later in a federal court.

Currently at the helm of The United States and as the Commander in Chief of the military is a trigger happy president. ( If you think im exaggerating then you may not have heard about him dropping the “Mother of all Bombs” on Afghanistan after 4 months of being in office.  Or sending in “Federal help” to combat Chicago gun violence)  He has absolutely no problem using the military or federal resources to “keep things under control” nor does he have any problems signing executive orders that are discriminatory in manner or that fall outside the lines of the law.  Using the entertainment arena to cause racial division and upset withing the country in hopes to lead the people into mass unrest and violence will give him the justification he needs t declare an emergency across the United States,  enact the King Alfred Plan and send whomever they deem to be a threat and or “the minority and minority supporters”  to military controlled camps FEMA camps or whatever other kinda camp they want to call it.

Be Wise Be Careful and Be Safe

0
Featured Hidden Knowledge Life Politics

The King Alfred Plan aka Rex 84 (To Lock Up Minorities in Wartime or Dissension)

By Royal Awakening — 7 years ago

Divide and Conquer

It’s no coincidence that in these times there are a lot of things going on that keep us from seeing the bigger picture while a war is brewing.  Governmental agencies as well as the authorities that run them have had long standing policies and procedures they implement during times of war,  civil unrest and rebellion as well as to cause internal conflict and war.

A leaked US Army Military Police training manual for “Civil Disturbance Operations” outlines how military assets are to be used domestically to quell riots, confiscate firearms and even kill Americans on U.S. soil during mass civil unrest.  The document outlines how military assets will be used to “help local and state authorities to restore and maintain law and order” in the event of mass riots, civil unrest or a declaration of martial law.

Click to Download full Document

The primary function of military assets will be focused around, “breaking up unauthorized gatherings and by patrolling the disturbance area to prevent the commission of lawless acts,” states the document, adding, “during operations to restore order, military forces may present a show of force, establish roadblocks, break up crowds, employ crowd control agents, patrol, serve as security forces or reserves, and perform other operations as required.”  On page 20 of the manual, rules regarding the use of “deadly force” in confronting “dissidents” are made disturbingly clear with the directive that a, “Warning shot will not be fired.”

Round up the Minority and the Minority Supporters

Rex 84, short for Readiness Exercise 1984, was established under the pretext of a “mass exodus” of illegal aliens crossing the Mexican/US border.  During the Iran-Contra hearings in 1987, however, it was revealed that the program was a secretive “scenario and drill” developed by the federal government to suspend the Constitution, declare martial law, assign military commanders to take over state and local governments, and detain large numbers of American citizens determined by the government to be “national security threats.”  The large nuber of “American citizens” to detained are identified in a subsequent memo entitled the King Alfred Plan later named Rex 84.

Playlist

3 Videos

Here is an outline of this memo: (I’ve Added Headers and bold text to make the areas of importance clear)

KING ALFRED PLAN
In the event of widespread and continuing and coordinated racial disturbances in the United States, King Alfred, at the discretion of the President, is to be put into action immediately.

PARTICIPATING FEDERAL AGENCIES
National Security Council
Department of Justice
Central Intelligence Agency
Department of Defense
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Department of Interior

PARTICIPATING STATE AGENCIES

Memo: National Security Council

Even before 1954, when the Supreme Court of the United States of America declared unconstitutional separate educational and recreational facilities, racial unrest and discord had become very nearly a part of the American way of life. But that way of life was repugnant to most Americans. Since 1954, however, that unrest and discord have broken out into widespread violence which increasingly have placed the peace and stability of the nation in dire jeopardy.

This violence has resulted in loss of life, limb and property, and has cost the taxpayers of this nation billions of dollars. And the end is not yet in sight. This same violence has raised the tremendously grave question as to whether the races can ever live in peace with each other. Each passing month has brought new intelligence that, despite new laws passed to alleviate the condition of the Minority, the Minority still is not satisfied. Demonstrations and rioting have become a part of the familiar scene.

Troops have been called out in city after city across the land, and our image as a world leader severely damaged. Our enemies press closer, seeking the advantage, possibly at a time during one of these outbreaks of violence. The Minority has adopted an almost military posture to gain its objectives, which are not clear to most Americans. 

It is expected, therefore, that when those objectives are denied the Minority, racial war must be considered inevitable. When that emergency comes, we must expect the total involvement of all 22 million members of the Minority, men, women, and children, for once this project is launched, its goal is to terminate, once and for all, the Minority threat to the whole of the American society, and indeed, the Free World.

Chairman, National Security Council

Preliminary Memo: Department of Interior

Lock Them Up Indefinitely and terminate, once and for all, the Minority threat

Under King Alfred, the nation has been divided into 10 regions. In case of Emergency, Minority members will be evacuated from the cities by federalized national guard units, local and state police and, if necessary, by units of the Regular Armed Forces, using public and military transportation, and detained in nearby military installations until a further course of action has been decided.

1 – Capital Region
2 – Northeast Region
3 – Southeast Region
4 – Great Lakes Region
5 – South Central Region
6 – Deep South Region
7 – Deep South Region II
8 – Great Plains, Rocky mountain Region
9 – Southwest Region
10 – West Coast Region

No attempt will be made to seal off the Canadian and Mexican borders.

Secretary, Department of Interior
* 849-899 King of England who slaughtered thousands under the disguise of protecting the European religion of Christianity. As a result he was revered as one of the most noble Kings in the history of England.

Combined Memo: Department of Justice
Preliminary Memo: Federal Bureau of Investigation & Central Intelligence Agency

Target Minority Groups and Organizations and their Leaders

There are 12 major Minority organizations and all are familiar to the 22 million. Dossiers have been compiled on the leaders of the organizations, and can be studied in Washington. The material contained in many of the dossiers, and our threat to reveal that material, has considerably held in check some of the leaders. Leaders who do not have such usable material in their dossiers have been approached to take government posts, mostly as ambassadors and primarily in African countries.

The promise of these positions also has materially contributed to a temporary slow-down of Minority activities. However, we do not expect these slow-downs to be of long duration, because there are always new and dissident elements joining these organizations, with the potential power to replace the old leaders. All organizations and their leaders are under constant, 24-hour surveillance. The organizations are:

1 – The Black Muslims
2 – Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC)
3 – Congress of Racial Equality
4 – Uhuru Movement
5 – Group On Advanced Leadership (GOAL)
6 – Freedom Now Party (FNP)
7 – United Black Nationalists of America (UBNA)
8 – The New Pan-African Movement (TNPAM)
9 – Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC)
10 – The National Urban League (NUL)
11 – The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP)
12 – Committee on Racial and Religious Progress (CORARP)

NOTE: At the appropriate time, to be designated by the President, the leaders of some of these organizations are to be detained ONLY WHEN IT IS CLEAR THAT THEY CANNOT PREVENT THE EMERGENCY, working with local public officials during the first critical hours. All other leaders are to be detained at once. Compiled lists of Minority leaders have been readied at the National Data Computer Center.

It is necessary to use the Minority leaders designated by the President in much the same manner in which we use Minority members who are agents with Central and Federal, and we cannot, until there is no alternative, reveal King Alfred in all its aspects. Minority members of Congress will be unseated at once. This move is not without precedent in American history.

Attorney General

Preliminary Memo: Department of Defense

This memo is being submitted in lieu of a full report from the Joint Chiefs of Staff. That report is now in preparation. There will be many cities where the Minority will be able to put into the street a superior number of people with a desperate and dangerous will. He will be a formidable enemy, for he is bound to the Continent by heritage and knows that political asylum will not be available to him in other countries.

The greatest concentration of the Minority is in the Deep South, the Eastern seaboard, the Great lakes region and the West Coast. While the national population exceeds that of the Minority by more than ten times, we must realistically take into account the following:

1 – An estimated 40-50 percent of the white population will not, for various reasons, engage the Minority during an Emergency.
2 – American Armed Forces are spread around the world. A breakout of war abroad means fewer troops at home to handle the Emergency.
3 – Local law enforcement officials must contain the Emergency until help arrives, though it may mean fighting a superior force. New York City, for example, has a 25,000 man police force, but there are about one million Minority members in the city.

We are confident that the Minority would hold any city it took for only a few hours. The lack of weapons, facilities, logistics — all put the Minority at a final disadvantage.

Since the Korean War, this department has shifted Minority members of the Armed Forces to areas where combat is most likely to occur, with the aim of eliminating, through combat, as many combat-trained military servicemen as possible. Today the ratio of Minority member combat deaths in Vietnam, where they are serving as “advisors,” is twice as high as the Minority population ratio to the rest of America. Below is the timetable for King Alfred as tentatively suggested by the JCS who recommend that the operation be made over a period of eight hours:

1. Local police and Minority leaders in action to head off the Emergency.
2. Countdown to eight hours begins at the moment the President determines the Emergency to be:
a. National
b. Coordinated
c. Of Long Duration (8th hour)
3. County police join local police (7th hour)
4. State police join county and local police (6th hour)
5. Federal marshals join state, county, and local forces (5th hour)
6. National guards federalized, held in readiness (4th hour)
7. Regular Armed Forces alerted, take up positions; Minority troops divided and detained,
along with all white sympathizers, under guard (3rd hour)
8. All minority leaders, national and local detained (2nd hour)
9. President addresses Minority on radio-television,
gives it one hour to end the Emergency (1st hour)
10. All units under regional commands into the Emergency (0 hour)
“0” Committee Report:

Survey shows that during a six-year period, production created 9,000,000 objects, or 1,500,000 each year. Production could not dispose of the containers, which proved a bottleneck. However, that was almost 20 years ago. We suggest that vaporization techniques be employed to overcome the production problems inherent in King Alfred.

(The “0” Committee Report is referring to the problems that occurred in Nazi Germany when the furnaces were not hot enough to burn the bodies that Hitler had killed. The bodies clogged up the furnaces thereby causing a problem that the above committee recommends avoiding by building high-volume (nuclear-powered) incinerators that burn 5,000 degrees. It should be noted that steel melts at approximately 2700 degrees!)

The internment of Japanese Americans in the United States during World War II was the forced relocation and incarceration in camps in the western interior of the country of between 110,000 and 120,000 people of Japanese ancestry, most of whom lived on the Pacific coast.

To Sum it Up and Tie it all Together

Don’t be fooled by all the fluff and do not allow them to ake you engage in behavior and activity that will allow the to say “that’s why we need  to lock them up”.  These things are all being done intentionally in order to make you an enemy of the state and a threat to “public safety”.

Revelation 13:5-10

5And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months. 6And he opened his mouth in blasphemy against God, to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven.

7And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations. 8And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world. 9If any man have an ear, let him hear. 10He that leadeth into captivity shall go into captivity: he that killeth with the sword must be killed with the sword. Here is the patience and the faith of the saints

2
Culture Family Featured Hidden Knowledge Homosexuality Life Religion & Spirituality

The Great Gay Debate… The Damned Homosexuals

By atlcustoms — 8 years ago

The debate surrounding homosexuality and its perceived condemnation remains a highly contentious issue among churches, religious followers, and even within the government. These discussions often revolve around biblical interpretations, particularly verses such as Leviticus 18:22: “Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.” As a result, many condemn homosexuality, sometimes focusing solely on it as a sin above others.

In response, some churches, camps, and programs have been established with the goal of “praying the gay away,” based on the belief that homosexuality is not innate but rather the result of demonic possession or personal choice. Additionally, some argue that God despises homosexuality, citing the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah as divine punishment for such behavior. Common phrases like “God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve” and “Man is meant to be fruitful and multiply” are used to argue that homosexuality contradicts nature, and therefore, defies God’s design.

Now, let us examine these references in their full context to uncover the truth of these matters and discern what God truly says about them.

Before we examine the scriptures, it’s important to clarify a key distinction: there is a significant difference between being gay and being a homosexual.

The term homosexual originated in the English language in the 19th century and is used to describe someone who engages in sexual relations with the same gender. Because the word itself contains “sex,” the emphasis is often placed on the act of sex. However, many people labeled as homosexual may choose not to engage in sexual acts for various reasons, such as personal convictions, lack of desire, concerns about disease, or societal pressures.

In contrast, the word gay refers to a person who experiences romantic or emotional attraction toward the same gender. The term has much older roots, dating back to before the 14th century in archaic French. Interestingly, when translated into Hebrew, gay corresponds to the term homo, meaning “same” or “uniform.” The concept of homogenization refers to making something uniform or blending diverse elements into one. By contrast, reverse homogenization separates a uniform structure into distinct parts.

A biblical example of these concepts can be seen in the creation of Adam and Eve. In the beginning, God created Adam alone—there was no Adam and Eve or Adam and Steve, only Adam and God. Genesis 2:7 states:

“And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.”

Adam existed as a singular being (homogenized), fulfilling the role God assigned to him. However, God declared that it was not good for man to be alone and decided to create a suitable helper. After forming all the animals, none were found to be an appropriate companion. Then, in Genesis 2:21-22:

“And the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof; And the rib, which the Lord God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.”

Here, God took a part of Adam and made it into a separate being—this is reverse homogenization, where one uniform structure was divided into two distinct parts. Yet, in Genesis 2:24, the two were meant to reunite:

“Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.”

This represents re-homogenization, where the two distinct parts come together again as one. If God originally made one and then separated it into two, is He not also capable of placing the balance of two within one, just as it was in the beginning?

By definition, eunuchs were individuals who, for various reasons—biological or social—did not engage in traditional heterosexual relationships. In today’s terms, this could be compared to those who identify as gay or homosexual, as society often labels individuals based on their deviation from expected norms of attraction and procreation.

What Does God Say About Eunuchs?

Rather than condemning eunuchs, God acknowledges and honors them:

Isaiah 56:4-5
“For thus saith the Lord unto the eunuchs that keep my sabbaths, and choose the things that please me, and take hold of my covenant; Even unto them will I give in mine house and within my walls a place and a name better than of sons and of daughters: I will give them an everlasting name, that shall not be cut off.”

This passage shows that God values those who are faithful to Him, regardless of their status or ability to procreate. He promises them a place of honor, even greater than that of traditional family lineage.

Acts 8:36-38
“And as they went on their way, they came unto a certain water: and the eunuch said, See, here is water; what doth hinder me to be baptized? And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God. And he commanded the chariot to stand still: and they went down both into the water, both Philip and the eunuch; and he baptized him.”

This account reinforces that eunuchs were fully accepted into the faith. God and The Bible does not condemn eunuchs—instead, God acknowledges their existence, grants them a place of honor, and welcomes them into His covenant.

 

Born That Way

The term gay describes the natural disposition of a person such as a eunuch. In Matthew 19:11-12, Jesus speaks about different types of eunuchs:

Matthew 19:11-12
“But he said unto them, All men cannot receive this saying, save they to whom it is given. For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother’s womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven’s sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.”

Understanding Eunuchs

Historically, the term eunuch referred to men who had been castrated, usually at a young age, which affected their hormonal development. However, in ancient texts, the term was also used to describe men who were impotent, celibate, or simply not inclined to marry and have children.

Eunuchs were often employed in royal courts and harems as servants or guards because they were considered trustworthy and had no personal ties to aristocratic families. Many societies believed eunuchs lacked the same desires and ambitions as other men, making them more reliable in certain roles. The Byzantine Emperor Leo VI even banned eunuchs from marrying in the 9th century, reinforcing the idea that they were not meant for traditional male-female relationships.

What About  Sodom and Gomorrah?

Many people believe that Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed solely because of homosexuality, but the Bible provides a much broader explanation of their wickedness.

What Does the Bible Say?

Ezekiel 16:48-50 clearly outlines the sins of Sodom:

Ezekiel 16:48-50
“As I live, saith the Lord God, Sodom thy sister hath not done, she nor her daughters, as thou hast done, thou and thy daughters. Behold, this was the iniquity of thy sister Sodom: pride, fullness of bread, and abundance of idleness was in her and in her daughters, neither did she strengthen the hand of the poor and needy. And they were haughty, and committed abomination before me: therefore I took them away as I saw good.”

This passage highlights pride, greed, laziness, mistreatment of the poor, arrogance, and abominations as the key reasons for their destruction. There is no mention of homosexuality as the primary sin.

What Does the Book of Jasher Say?

The Book of Jasher (or Sefer haYashar), an ancient text referenced in Joshua and 2 Samuel, gives additional insight into the extreme wickedness of Sodom and Gomorrah. Chapter 19 describes how these cities were brutal, inhumane, and merciless, particularly toward the poor and outsiders.

Examples of Their Wickedness:

  • A poor man was secretly given food. When the people found out, they burned alive the woman who helped him.
  • A traveler was given food and water by a kind young woman. As punishment, the people covered her in honey and let bees sting her to death.

These laws didn’t just permit evil—they punished kindness.

The Truth About “Bedding” in Sodom and Gomorrah

Many people focus on the attempted assault of Lot’s angelic guests as proof that Sodom’s sin was homosexuality. Genesis 19

4 But before they lay down, the men of the city, even the men of Sodom, compassed the house round, both old and young, all the people from every quarter:

5 And they called unto Lot, and said unto him, Where are the men which came in to thee this night? bring them out unto us, that we may know them.

However, the Book of Jasher explains that “bedding” was a cruel form of torture and humiliation used against outsiders, not an act of love or attraction.

Jasher 19:3-7 describes their sadistic practice:

  • The cities had special torture beds in the streets.
  • If a man arrived in town, the people would force him onto a bed.
  • If he was too short, they would stretch him until he nearly died.
  • If he was too tall, they would crush him until he was near death.
  • When victims cried out for help, the people mocked them, saying, “Thus shall it be done to a man that cometh into our land.”

 

  •  

This was not about sexual desire—it was about power, cruelty, and humiliation.

Why Did God Destroy Sodom and Gomorrah?

The wickedness of these cities went far beyond one sin. They were corrupt, heartless, and completely devoid of mercy. Their actions provoked God’s judgment, as Jasher 19:44 states:

Jasher 19:44
“And the Lord was provoked at this and at all the works of the cities of Sodom, for they had abundance of food, and had tranquility amongst them, and still would not sustain the poor and the needy, and in those days their evil doings and sins became great before the Lord.”

This perfectly aligns with Ezekiel 16:48-50, showing that their destruction was due to their pride, greed, oppression of the poor, and extreme wickedness—not simply because of homosexuality.

Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed because they were a lawless, merciless society that thrived on cruelty and injustice. The idea that their downfall was solely due to homosexuality is an oversimplification that ignores the full biblical and historical context.

The real lesson from Sodom and Gomorrah is that God despises oppression, injustice, and a lack of compassion—and that when a society reaches a certain level of wickedness, divine judgment follows.

Gays Don’t Procreate, You’re Supposed to be Fruitful and Multiply!

Some argue that same-sex relationships go against God’s command to “be fruitful and multiply” since they cannot naturally produce children. However, a closer look at the Bible reveals that this command was not universally given to all people at all times.

Was “Be Fruitful and Multiply” Given to Adam and Eve?

Contrary to popular belief, God did not issue the command to be fruitful and multiply to Adam and Eve after they were expelled from the Garden of Eden. Instead, He pronounced curses upon them due to their disobedience:

  • The Serpent was cursed to crawl on its belly and live in enmity with humanity (Genesis 3:14-15).
  • Eve was cursed with pain in childbirth and subjugation to her husband (Genesis 3:16).
  • Adam was cursed with toil and hardship in working the land (Genesis 3:17-19).
  • Both were expelled from the Garden and forced to live in a fallen world (Genesis 3:23).

Nowhere in this passage does God command them to multiply.

Who Was Commanded to Multiply?

The command to be fruitful and multiply was later given to Noah and his sons after the flood:

Genesis 9:1
“And God blessed Noah and his sons, and said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth.”

This command was given in a specific context—to repopulate the earth after its destruction. It was not a blanket command for all people in all circumstances.

God Decides When and With Whom to Bring Forth Children

Throughout Scripture, we see that God not only commands people to have children at certain times but also prohibits it in others:

  • God directed Abraham’s servant to find a wife for Isaac from a specific lineage (Genesis 24:7).
  • God commanded Jeremiah not to marry or have children because of the coming judgment upon the land (Jeremiah 16:1-4).

This shows that procreation is not simply a matter of nature—it is directed by God’s wisdom and timing.

God’s Sovereignty Over Creation

God, who created the heavens and the earth, is in full control over life and its continuation. He has the power to give and take away:

  • He made a donkey speak (Numbers 22:28).
  • He commands the stars to shine or fall (Job 38:31-33).
  • He can stop or allow life to be produced according to His will.

If God commands the stars to fall, will they not obey? If He commands mankind to cease producing, will mankind not also obey?

0
Culture Featured Hidden Knowledge Life Politics

400 Years A Slave

By Royal Awakening — 8 years ago

The Land of the Free (except slaves)

The year 1619 was the year in which the first black or ”African” slaves by Dutch ships arrived in the British colonies of North America or what is known today as The United States.  From the year 1619 to 1865 the blacks in America endured the worst kind of slavery and servitude mankind had never known before.  We know about it. We hear it every year during black history month ( even though most accounts are filtered and downplayed to protect the public from all of the horrific atrocities that befell the American slaves ). In the year 1865 the 13th amendment and the Emancipation Proclamation came into place changing the status of “slaves” to “free”. XIII NEITHER SLAVERY NOR INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE, EXCEPT AS A PUNISHMENT FOR CRIME WHEREOF THE PARTY SHALL HAVE BEEN DULY CONVICTED, SHALL EXIST WITHIN THE UNITED STATES, OR ANY PLACE SUBJECT TO THEIR JURISDICTION

1619-1865 = 246 Years a Slave

By reading this we can safely deduce that this amendment left open 2 forms of slavery and servitude allowed in the United States.  Number 1: Penal labor when convicted of a crime.  When you are convicted of a crime and go to jail or prison you are then again enslaved and become a source of free labor for the government or state.  We know that there has been a mass incarceration of blacks since this institution on this proclamation; even when it was illegal and a jail-able offense just to look at a person of another race or to even gather together.  Therefore putting them in prisons and reducing them to slavery once again.

Credit System = Debt System

The second kind of slavery or servitude is allowed with the words “nor involuntary servitude” leaving open voluntary servitude.  Well who would volunteer to slavery or servitude?  Well the day you have children you voluntarily give them over to your government to be issued certificates and numbers that place them within their system of ownership.  They become property just like a vehicle or home.  If you skip a tax payment on your home or car even if you hold the title can they still not come take it?  Stop sending your child to school can they not come take it? If it is yours no one should be able to stake claim on whats yours and take it.Once you or your children are entered into this system and assigned a class, they are indoctrinated and then put into a work-field in which many make only enough to pay for housing and food.  Then a system of debt is imposed upon them saying you do not make enough so you have to get credit, extend yourself beyond what you make and pay it back, therefore ensuring your remain within their system of work to continuously pay off the debt you have incurred to live.  And they promote this system as more valuable saying the more we can extend a debt to you the higher your status will be.

1865 – 1965 = 100 Years a Slave

So since 1619 the “African Americans” in America has been subjected to many different forms of slavery, and still subject to rules laws and practices that were enacted before, during and after the times of “voluntary servitude” in the United States. 1865 did not end slavery in the United States at all, it just concealed it under better terms.In the South, there were “slave codes“; the goal was of these codes were to reduce influence of free blacks (particularly after slave rebellions) because of their potential influence on slaves. Restrictions included prohibiting them from voting (although North Carolina allowed this before 1831), bearing arms, gathering in groups for worship and learning to read and write. A major purpose of these laws was to preserve slavery.

Black Codes

Black Codes were laws In the United States passed by Democrat-controlled Southern states in 1865 and 1866, after the Civil War.  Black Codes were also enacted by Northern states such as Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, and New York prior to the Civil War to ban free blacks from residing in those states.  These codes were modeled after the earlier slave codes and had the intent of restricting the freedom of black people, and of compelling them to work in a labor economy based on low wages or debt.  States were particularly concerned with controlling movement and labor, as slavery had given way to a free labor system. Although freedmen had been emancipated, their lives were greatly restricted by the Black Codes.Black Codes were part of a larger pattern of Southern whites trying to suppress the new freedom of emancipated black slaves, the freedmen.



The defining feature of the Black Codes was broad vagrancy law.  Homeless unemployed Black Americans were arrested and fined as vagrants or a person, often in poverty, who wanders from place to place without a home or regular employment or income.. Usually, the person could not afford the fine, and so was sent to work in convict leasing camps. In these camps is where they would remain, “paying their debt”, and inevitably be re-enlisted back into slavery by white slave holders.which allowed local authorities to arrest freedpeople for minor infractions and commit them to involuntary labor. Preexisting White American belief of Black inferiority informed post-war attitudes and white racial dominance continued to be culturally embedded; whites believed both that Black people were destined for servitude and that they would not work unless physically compelled.The racial divisions which slavery had created immediately became more obvious.  Blacks also bore the brunt of Southern anger over defeat in the War.  The Black Codes outraged public opinion in the North because it seemed the South was creating a form of quasi-slavery to negate the results of the war.The 1865–1866 Black Codes were an overt manifestation of the system of white supremacy that continued to dominate the American South.

Because legal enforcement depended on so many different local codes, which underwent less scrutiny than statewide legislation, , that even under military rule, local jurisdictions were able to continue a racist pattern of law enforcement, as long as it took place under a legal regime that was superficially race-neutral.  In 1893–1909 every Southern state except Tennessee passed new vagrancy laws.  These laws were more severe than those passed in 1865, and used vague terms that granted wide powers to police officers enforcing the law.  In wartime, Blacks might be disproportionately subjected to “work or fight” laws, which increased vagrancy penalties for those not in the military.

A general system of legitimized anti-Black violence, as exemplified by the Ku Klux Klan, played a major part in enforcing the practical law of white supremacy. The constant threat of violence against Black people (and White people who sympathized with them) maintained a system of extralegal terror.

“Jump Jim Crow”

The origin of the phrase “Jim Crow” has been attributed to “Jump Jim Crow”, a song-and-dance caricature of blacks performed by a white actor in blackface.   As a result of Rice’s fame, “Jim Crow” by 1838 had become a pejorative expression meaning “Negro”. When southern legislatures passed laws of racial segregation directed against blacks at the end of the 19th century, these statutes became known as Jim Crow laws.

Jim Crow laws were state and local laws that enforced racial segregation in the Southern United States beginning in the 1890’s.  These laws continued to be enforced until 1965.  They mandated by law racial segregation in all public facilities in the states of the former Confederate States of America, starting in 1896 with a “separate but equal” status for Blacks in railroad cars.  These Jim Crow laws revived principles of the 1865 and 1866 Black Codes, which had previously restricted the civil rights and civil liberties of Blacks in America.

White Southerners encountered problems in learning free labor management after the end of slavery, and they resented black Americans, who represented the Confederacy’s Civil War defeat: With white supremacy being challenged throughout the South; many whites sought to protect their former status by threatening, lynching and killing blacks who exercised their new rights.”  White Democrats used their power to segregate public spaces and facilities in law and reestablish social dominance over blacks in the South.

Separate but Equal: The Law of the Land

Separate but equal was a legal doctrine in United States constitutional law according to which racial segregation did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, adopted in 1868, which guaranteed “equal protection” under the law to all citizens. Under the doctrine, as long as the facilities provided to each race were equal, state and local governments could require that services, facilities, public accommodations, housing, medical care, education, employment, and transportation be segregated by race, which was already the case throughout the former Confederacy

Though segregation laws existed before this decision it emboldened segregation states during the Jim Crow era, which had commenced in 1876 and supplanted the Black Codes, which restricted the civil rights and civil liberties of blacks during the Reconstruction Era after the civil war. 18 states had segregation laws.

In practice the separate “but equal” facilities provided to blacks were always separate but rarely equal; usually they were not even close to equal, or they did not exist at all.  The facilities and social services offered to African-Americans were almost always of lower quality than those offered to white Americans; for example, many African American schools received less public funding per student than nearby white schools. In Texas, the state established a state-funded law school for white students without any law school for black students.  The majority of all black schools received old textbooks, used equipment, and poorly prepared or trained teachers.  A study conducted by the American Psychological Association found that black students were emotionally impaired when segregated at a young age.  State voting right restrictions, such as literacy tests and poll taxes created an environment that made it almost impossible for blacks to vote.   The finding contributed to at least 58 more years of legalized discrimination and oppression against black and colored people in the United States.

Strange Fruit Hanging From Those Trees

Lynching is an extrajudicial punishment by an informal group. It is most often used to characterize informal public executions by a mob in order to punish an alleged transgressor, or to intimidate a group.  The verb comes from the phrase “Lynch Law”, a term for a punishment without trial. Two Americans during this era are generally credited for inventing the phrase: Charles Lynch and William Lynch, who both lived in Virginia in the 1780s.  Charles Lynch was a Virginia planter and American Revolutionary who headed a county court in Virginia which incarcerated Loyalist supporters of the British for up to one year during the war. While he lacked proper jurisdiction, he claimed this right by arguing wartime necessity.  Subsequently, he prevailed upon the Congress of the Confederation to pass a law which specifically exonerated him and his associates from wrongdoing.  This move by the Congress provoked controversy, and it was in connection with this that the term “Lynch law”, meaning the assumption of extrajudicial authority, came into common parlance in the United States leading to many “lynchings” of blacks in the United States.

In the United States, during the decades before the Civil War assertive free-Blacks, Latinos in the South West and runaways were the objects of racial lynching.  But lynching attacks on U.S. blacks, especially in the South, increased dramatically in the aftermath of the Civil War, after slavery had been abolished and recently freed black men gained the right to vote.  More than 3500 were lynched in the United States between 1882 and 1968.

Lynching, as a form of punishment for presumed criminal offenses were performed by self-appointed commissions, mobs, or vigilantes without due process of law took place in the United States both before and after the American Civil War, most commonly in Southern states and Western frontier settlements. Racist extremism with an eye to viciousness and public spectacle was frequently evident, as exemplified by the first lynching in St. Louis when in 1835 a black man named McIntosh who killed a deputy sheriff while being taken to jail was captured, chained to a tree, and burned to death on a corner lot downtown in front of a crowd of over 1,000 people.  In the South, members of the abolitionist movement or other people who opposed slavery were usually targets of lynch mob violence before the Civil War. During the war, Southern Home Guard units sometimes lynched white Southerners who they suspected of being Unionists or deserters.

After the war, southern whites struggled to maintain their social dominance. Secret vigilante and insurgent groups such as the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) instigated extrajudicial assaults and killings in order to keep whites in power and discourage freedmen from voting, working, gathering together, worshipping  and getting educated. They also sometimes attacked Northerners, teachers, and agents of the Freedmen’s Bureau.  Mobs usually alleged crimes for which they lynched blacks. In the late 19th century, however, journalist Ida B. Wells showed that many presumed crimes were either exaggerated or had not even occurred. Mob violence arose as a means of enforcing white supremacy and it frequently verged on systematic political terrorism. “The Ku Klux Klan, paramilitary groups, and other whites united by frustration and anger ruthlessly defended the interests of white supremacy. The magnitude of the extralegal violence which occurred during election campaigns reached epidemic proportions.  During Reconstruction after the war, the Ku Klux Klan and others used lynching as a means to control blacks, forcing them to work for planters and preventing them from exercising their right to vote.

Emmett Louis Till (July 25, 1941 – August 28, 1955) was a 14-year-old African-American who was lynched in Mississippi in 1955, after a white woman said she was offended by him in her family’s grocery store.  Till’s reported behavior, perhaps unwittingly, violated the strictures of conduct for an African American male interacting with a white woman in the Jim Crow era South.   Several nights after the store incident, a few men went armed to Till’s great-uncle’s house and abducted the boy. They took him away and beat and mutilated him before shooting him in the head and sinking his body in the Tallahatchie River. Three days later, Till’s body was discovered and retrieved from the river.

In September 1955, Bryant and Milam were acquitted by an all-white jury of Till’s kidnapping and murder. Protected against double jeopardy, the two men publicly admitted in a 1956 interview with Look magazine that they had intentionally killed Till.  In 2017 the woman accuser admitted that “inappropriate action” from Emmett till never occurred.

A lot of these laws, practices and doctrines were overturned and supposedly outawed by a series of Supreme Court decisions, starting with Brown v. Board of Education of 1954. However, the overturning of segregation laws in the United States was a long process that lasted through much of the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s, involving federal legislation (especially the Civil Rights Act of 1964), and many court cases.

1965 – 2017 =  52 Years a Slave

The Civil Rights Act of 1964  is a landmark civil rights and US labor law in the United States[5] that outlaws discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.[6] It prohibited unequal application of voter registration requirements, racial segregation in schools, employment, and public accommodations.  Its duty is to guarantee all citizens equal protection of the laws under the Fourteenth Amendment and its duty to protect voting rights under the Fifteenth Amendment. The Act was signed into law on July 2, 1964.

This law was not without opposition.  When the bill came before the full Senate for debate on March 30, 1964, the “Southern Bloc” of 18 southern Democratic Senators and one Republican Senator led by Richard Russell (D-GA) launched a filibuster to prevent its passage. Said Russell: “We will resist to the bitter end any measure or any movement which would have a tendency to bring about social equality and intermingling and amalgamation of the races in our (Southern) states.

There were white business owners who claimed that Congress did not have the constitutional authority to ban segregation in public accommodations. For example, Moreton Rolleston, the owner of a motel in Atlanta, Georgia, said he should not be forced to serve black travelers, saying, “the fundamental question…is whether or not Congress has the power to take away the liberty of an individual to run his business as he sees fit in the selection and choice of his customers”.  Rolleston claimed that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was a breach of the Fourteenth Amendment and also violated the Fifth and Thirteenth Amendments by depriving him of “liberty and property without due process”.

Resistance to the public accommodation clause continued for years on the ground, especially in the South.  When local college students in Orangeburg, South Carolina attempted to desegregate a bowling alley in 1968, they were violently attacked, leading to rioting and what became known as the “Orangeburg massacre.”  Resistance by school boards continued into the next decade, with the most significant declines in black-white school segregation only occurring at the end of the 1960s and the start of the 1970s in the aftermath of the Green v. County School Board of New Kent County (1968) court decision that held that New Kent County‘s freedom of choice plan did not constitute adequate compliance with the school board’s responsibility to determine a system of admission to public schools on a non-racial basis. The Supreme Court mandated that the school board must formulate new plans and steps towards realistically converting to a desegregated system.

Can't We All Just Get Along

Rodney King Riots

2 Videos

Fast Forward to the 1992 Los Angeles riots, also known as the Rodney King riots.  These riots were a series of riots, lootings, arsons, and civil disturbances that occurred in Los Angeles County, California in April and May 1992. The unrest began after a trial jury acquitted four officers of the Los Angeles Police Department of the use of excessive force in the videotaped arrest and beating of Rodney King. It then spread throughout the Los Angeles metropolitan area as thousands of people rioted over a six-day period following the announcement of the verdict.  Before the release of the Rodney King tape which showed footage of King being beaten by police while lying on the ground, minority community leaders in Los Angeles had repeatedly complained about harassment and excessive use of force by LAPD officers.  An independent commission formed after the release of the tape concluded that a “significant number” of LAPD officers “repetitively use excessive force against the public and persistently ignore the written guidelines of the department regarding force,” and that bias related to race, gender, and sexual orientation were regularly contributing factors in use of excessive force.

Mark Fuhrman and the O.J. Simpson Trial

The Fuhrman tapes are 13 hours of taped interviews given by Los Angeles police officer Mark Fuhrman to writer Laura McKinny between 1985 and 1994. The tapes include many racist slurs and remarks made by Fuhrman, including uses of the word “nigger,” descriptions of police brutality perpetrated on black suspects, misogynist slurs and descriptions of the harassment and intimidation of female Los Angeles police officers by male officers. Portions of the tapes were admitted into evidence during the O. J. Simpson murder case. In the tapes Fuhrman also made many references to the “planting of evidence” and implied that police brutality and evidence planting were common practice in the Los Angeles Police Department.

The 1995 OJ Simpson murder trial was one of the most sensational moments in recent US history. The world watched as the fault-lines of American race relations were laid bare in a Los Angeles courtroom. Simpson, a former American football player and actor, was found not guilty of murder in October 1995. His eight-month trial took place just three years since riots had rocked LA, following the acquittal of four white LAPD officers  filmed viciously beating black motorist Rodney King.  The O.J. Simpson trial as well as the Rodney King Trial highlighted and put on center stage racial tensions and injustices suffered by Blacks in America in the 1990’s.

Black Lives Matter

Fast Forward to 2013  after George Zimmerman was acquitted  of the shooting death of black unarmed 17 year old Trayvon Martin.  This killing as well as its subsequent acquittal was made into a public outcry because of decades of unfair and unequal treatment towards the Black communities and people, especially within the criminal justice system and by the hands of police whose duty was supposed to be to protect and serve them.

The killing of an unarmed 17 year old black male walking home with nothing but an Arizona tea and a bag of skittles and no one was held accountable; served to prove to the black community that no matter what you did or didn’t do as long as you were black you were an open target and the system would not grant fair justice for them, even in death.

In the weeks, months and years since there began to be a public outcry against black lives that were taken senselessly by the criminal justice system; the Black Lives Matter movement began to bring attention and focus to the tragic losses of life that continued to occur within the black communities by the justice system.

Some of the most notable killings were:

Michael Brown

Unarmed Michael Brown, 18, was shot and killed by Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson.  In November, a grand jury declined to charge Wilson in the fatal shooting. Brown’s death and the lack of charges against Wilson sparked protests, some of them violent, in Ferguson and across the nation.  On March 4, the Department of Justice announced that it too would not charge Wilson for the shooting after an exhaustive investigation.

Tamir Rice

Tamir Rice, 12, was shot and killed by Cleveland police after officers mistook his toy gun for a real weapon.  The two police officers involved, Timothy Loehmann and Frank Garmback, have not been charged.  Rice’s family has filed wrongful death lawsuit against the officers and the city of Cleveland.

 

Eric Garner

Eric Garner, 43, was killed after he was put in an illegal chokehold for 15 seconds by a white police officer — allegedly for selling loose cigarettes. Garner said “I can’t breathe” 11 times as he was held down by several officers on a sidewalk.  The officer who put Garner in the chokehold, Daniel Pantaleo, was not charged.  Garner’s death sparked peaceful protests across the nation, with demonstrators adopting the phrase “I Can’t Breathe” as a symbol and slogan of protest.

Philando Castile

On July 6, 2016, Philando Castile was shot and killed by a St. Anthony, Minnesota, police officer, after being pulled over in Falcon Heights, a suburb of Saint Paul.  A St. Anthony police officer patrolling Larpenteur Avenue radioed to a nearby squad that he planned to pull over the car and check the IDs of the driver and passenger, saying, “The two occupants just look like people that were involved in a robbery. The driver looks more like one of our suspects, just because of the wide-set nose. I couldn’t get a good look at the passenger.”

According to dashcam video, after Yanez asked for Castile’s driver’s license and proof of insurance, Castile gave him his proof of insurance card, which Yanez appeared to glance at and tuck in his outer pocket. Castile then calmly informed Yanez: “Sir, I have to tell you that I do have a firearm on me.”  Before Castile completed the sentence, Yanez interrupted and calmly replied, “OK,” and placed his right hand on the holster of his own holstered weapon. Yanez said, “Okay, don’t reach for it, then … don’t pull it out.” Castile responded, “I’m not pulling it out,” and Reynolds also said, “He’s not pulling it out.” Yanez repeated, raising his voice, “Don’t pull it out!” as he quickly pulled his own gun with his right hand and reached inside the driver’s window with his left hand. Reynolds screamed, “No!” Yanez removed his left arm from the car and fired seven shots in the direction of Castile in rapid succession. Reynolds yelled, “You just killed my boyfriend!” Castile moaned and said, “I wasn’t reaching for it.” Reynolds loudly said, “He wasn’t reaching for it.” Before she completed her sentence, Yanez again screamed, “Don’t pull it out!” Reynolds responded, “He wasn’t.” Yanez yelled, “Don’t move! Fuck!”  Of the seven shots fired by Yanez at point blank range, five hit Castile and two of those hit and pierced his heart.

On June 16, 2017, Officer Yanez was acquitted of all charges. He had been charged with manslaughter and reckless discharge of a firearm.

Sandra Bland

Sandra Bland was a 28-year-old black woman who was found hanged in a jail cell in Waller County, Texas, on July 13, 2015, three days after being arrested during a traffic stop.  Officer Encinia stopped Bland on the afternoon of July 10, 2015 in Prairie View, Texas, for failure to signal a lane change.  Dashcam footage shows that Encinia initially wrote a routine traffic violation warning for Bland. After he returns to her car and speaks briefly to her again, he asks her to put out her cigarette. She responds, “Why do I have to put out a cigarette when I’m in my own car?” Encinia orders her to “get out of the car”, and, when she repeatedly refuses to exit, he tells her she is under arrest. Bland repeatedly asks why she is under arrest, and Encinia responds, “I am giving you a lawful order.”  She refuses to leave her car, stating she is not under arrest as she is unaware of the reason and not obliged to. Encinia then opens her car door and tells her more than a dozen times to get out of the car before he tries to pull her out. After struggling, he draws his taser and points it at Bland, shouting “I will light you up! Get out! Now!”, at which point she exits her vehicle.  

Once Bland is out of her car, the officer orders her to put down her cell phone and tells her she is going to jail. In response, Bland asks why. In the video, both Bland and the officer move to the passenger side of the vehicle and are no longer visible, while they continue to argue heatedly. Bland can be heard crying and screaming.   Police stated that at 9:00 a.m. July 13,  Bland was found “in a semi-standing position” hanging in her cell.  Her death, which was ruled a suicide, was followed by protests against her arrest, disputing the cause of death, and alleging racial violence against her.

A grand jury declined to indict the county sheriff and jail staff for a felony relating to Bland’s death. In January 2016, Encinia was indicted for perjury for making false statements about the circumstances surrounding Bland’s arrest and he was subsequently fired by the Texas Department of Public Safety In September 2016, Bland’s mother settled a wrongful death lawsuit against the county jail and police department for $1.9 million and some procedural changes. In June 2017, the perjury charge against Encinia was dropped in return for his agreement to end his law enforcement career.

Now They Seek to Label YOU as Terrorists!

Since its inception the Black Lives Matter movement has received stark criticism from its opposers. Some critics accuse the movement of being anti-police.  A Sergeant of the Dallas Police Department filed an unsuccessful lawsuit against Black Lives Matter in September 2016, which accused the group of inciting a “race war.”  Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani said that Black Lives Matter is “inherently racist” and called the movement anti-American. According to Giuliani, the Black Lives Matter movement divides people and exacerbates racial tensions.

There have also been attempts and petitions signed to label the Black Lives Matter movement as a terrorist group, citing “Terrorism is defined as ‘the use of violence and intimidation in pursuit of political aims… This definition is the same definition used to declare ISIS and other groups, as terrorist organizations…Black Lives Matter earned this title due to its actions in Ferguson, Baltimore, and even at a Bernie Sander rally, as well as all over the United States and Canada.”   It been asked that the Pentagon recognize the group as such “on the grounds of principle, integrity, morality, and safety.” (rumor has it they have labeled them as that).

In a memo obtained by Foreign Policy from early August, the FBI claims that the continued concern over “alleged” police abuse has fueled a rise in violence against police. And that rise in violence has produced a new kind of terrorist. It reads in part: “The FBI assesses it is very likely Black Identity Extremist (BIE) perceptions of police brutality against African Americans spurred an increase in premeditated, retaliatory lethal violence against law enforcement and will very likely serve as justification for such violence,.”  “The FBI assesses it is very likely incidents of alleged police abuse against African Americans since then have continued to feed the resurgence in ideologically motivated, violent criminal activity within the Black Identity Extremist movement,” the report states.   So basically, the future likelihood of threats from a group that as far as we know does not exist (yet) is a potential threat that needs to be taken care of.

The National Defense Authorization Act greatly expands the power and scope of the federal government to fight the War on Terror, including codifying into law the indefinite detention of terrorism suspects without trial. Under the new law the US military has the power to carry out domestic anti-terrorism operations on US soil.  Former president Barack Obama when discussing  this law was quoted saying “There may be a number of people who cannot be prosecuted for past crimes, in some cases because evidence may be tainted; but who nonetheless pose a threat to the security of the United States.”  There may be = “there is a possibility” just like there was a possibility of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq… He was also quoted saying “If and when we determine that the United States must hold individuals to keep them from carrying out an act of war; we will do so within a system that involves judicial and congressional oversight.” and “Right now in distant training camps and in crowded cities, there are people plotting to take American lives. That will be the case a year from now; five years from now; and in all probability ten years from now.”  In other words if we think, feel or assume you are a threat to the United States in any form you are a terrorist (again with the definition being “the use of violence and intimidation in pursuit of political aims”) in order to prevent these things from possibly and probably inevitably occurring we have to detain these people on our assumptions without trial until we determine there is no threat.

Dig That Ditch For Yourselves

For 398 years from 1619 to 2017 blacks in America have been violently targeted for oppression and unfair treatment for political as well as financial gain.  Whether it was via the whip and shotguns by the slave master used to intimidate the slaves and keep them under control, the Ku Klux Klan and their nooses, robes and burning crosses keeping blacks from voting, or even by the police and military force that violently shuts down peaceful protests and marches against unfair treatment and arrest any participants they’d like with threats of more violence and arrests if their protests continue.  After 398 years of this you seek to label blacks as the terrorists?

Just in case no one was keeping track; it was not blacks who hijacked and crashed 2 commercial jets into twin towers of World Trade Center; and hijacked 2 more jets and crashed them  into the Pentagon and a field in rural Pa. leaving Total dead and missing around 2,992.  It wasn’t blacks who placed a car bomb outside a federal office building in Oklahoma City, which exploded collapsing wall and floors killing 168 people, including 19 children and 1 person who died in rescue effort.  It wasn’t blacks who mailedlLetters containing anthrax spores to several news media offices and two Democratic U.S. Senators, killing five people and infecting 17 others.

Kipland Philip Kinkel (born August 30, 1982)

In May 1998 After killing his parents at home, 15-year-old Kip Kinkel, drove to Thurston High School, where he killed two students and wounded 23 others.

Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold

In 1999 18-year-old Eric Harris and 17-year-old Dylan Klebold, students at Columbine High School, killed twelve students and one teacher. They injured 21 additional people, and three more were injured while attempting to escape the school. The pair committed suicide at the end of the massacre.

Jeffrey Weise

In 2005 16-year-old student Jeffrey Weise, killed his grandfather and grandfather’s companion at their home. He drove to Red Lake Senior High School. Armed with his grandfather’s police weapons, Weise killed five students, one teacher, and one security guard, wounding seven others, before committing suicide.

Seung-Hui Cho

In 2007 23-year-old student, Seung-Hui Cho, killed thirty-two students and faculty members at Virginia Tech, and wounded another seventeen students and faculty members in two separate attacks before committing suicide.

Adam Lanza

20-year-old Adam Lanza, killed twenty-six people and himself. He first killed his mother at their shared home before taking her guns and driving to the school. Lanza brought four guns with him. He killed twenty first-grade children aged six and seven during the attack at school, along with six adults, including four teachers, the principal, and the school psychologist. Two other persons were injured. Lanza then killed himself as police arrived at the school.

James Holmes

James Eagan Holmes was convicted of the murder of 12 people and the attempted murder of 70 others in the 2012 Aurora shooting at a Century movie theater in Aurora, Colorado. Holmes surrendered outside the theater and informed officers he had also  booby-trapped his apartment with explosives, which were defused one day later by a bomb squad.

Omar Mateen

Police say 29-year-old Omar Mateen opened fire at Pulse Orlando nightclub in Orlando, Fla. in June 2016. At least 49 people were killed, and more than 50 were wounded and taken to area hospitals. Mateen was killed during a firefight with police.

That’s 140 deaths and 150 injuries just between these 8 people alone.

Strange Fruit in a Strange Land

Acts 7:6

Acts 7:6 And God spake on this wise, That his seed should sojourn in a strange land; and that they should bring them into bondage, and entreat them evil four hundred years.  7 And the nation to whom they shall be in bondage will I judge, said God: and after that shall they come forth, and serve me in this place.

We know the story of Abraham and his children, and the covenant in which God made with him. Genesis 15:12  And when the sun was going down, a deep sleep fell upon Abram; and, lo, an horror of great darkness fell upon him.13 And he said unto Abram, Know of a surety that thy seed shall be a stranger in a land that is not theirs, and shall serve them; and they shall afflict them four hundred years;14 And also that nation, whom they shall serve, will I judge: and afterward shall they come out with great substance.15 And thou shalt go to thy fathers in peace; thou shalt be buried in a good old age.16 But in the fourth generation they shall come hither again: for the iniquity of the Amorites is not yet full.

You is Kind You is Smart You is Important

You are that seed.  This and many other prophecies are about you.  The Bible is the other side of black history; that has not been taught to you.


Jeremiah 29:14 And I will be found of you, saith the Lord: and I will turn away your captivity, and I will gather you from all the nations, and from all the places whither I have driven you, saith theLord; and I will bring you again into the place whence I caused you to be carried away captive.

God is calling his children.

2 Chronicles 7:14  If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.

I’ll leave off with these New Testament parables which were written about these things:

Matthew 13:24 Another parable put he forth unto them, saying, The kingdom of heaven is likened unto a man which sowed good seed in his field:25 But while men slept, his enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat, and went his way.26 But when the blade was sprung up, and brought forth fruit, then appeared the tares also.27 So the servants of the householder came and said unto him, Sir, didst not thou sow good seed in thy field? from whence then hath it tares?28 He said unto them, An enemy hath done this. The servants said unto him, Wilt thou then that we go and gather them up?29 But he said, Nay; lest while ye gather up the tares, ye root up also the wheat with them.30 Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn.

31 Another parable put he forth unto them, saying, The kingdom of heaven is like to a grain of mustard seed, which a man took, and sowed in his field:32 Which indeed is the least of all seeds: but when it is grown, it is the greatest among herbs, and becometh a tree, so that the birds of the air come and lodge in the branches thereof.

33 Another parable spake he unto them; The kingdom of heaven is like unto leaven, which a woman took, and hid in three measures of meal, till the whole was leavened.

0
Hidden Knowledge The Apocalypse

Chapter 0: Run to the Hills The Apocalypse is Coming!!!!

By atlcustoms — 8 years ago

The True Meaning of the Apocalypse: A Revelation, Not Annihilation

For centuries, the term “Apocalypse” has been misrepresented, often sensationalized as “the end of the world as we know it” or “the destruction of all civilization.” Many have associated it with global catastrophes—be it nuclear war, environmental collapse, or even extraterrestrial invasions. Popular culture has reinforced these fears, producing countless films and books that depict an earth shattered by fire, famine, and disaster. However, this understanding is rooted in misconception rather than biblical truth.

The Meaning of Apocalypse

The word Apocalypse originates from the Greek apokálypsis (ἀποκάλυψις), meaning “an uncovering” or “a revelation.” Far from signifying utter destruction, it refers to a divine disclosure—a revealing of hidden truths. In the biblical sense, the Apocalypse is not merely an event of doom but a moment of great unveiling, where the lies of this present world are exposed, and the divine order of God is made manifest.

Revelation 1:1 states, “The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant John.” This passage confirms that the Apocalypse is meant to illuminate divine truths rather than bring mindless destruction.

The End of Civilization as We Know It

The phrase “the end of the world as we know it” has been echoed by various historical figures. In the 20th century, President Ronald Reagan referenced biblical prophecy when discussing the Cold War, stating, “We may be the generation that sees Armageddon.” Similarly, General Douglas MacArthur, witnessing the devastation of World War II, warned, “We have had our last chance. If we do not now devise some greater and more equitable system, Armageddon will be at our door.” These statements reveal a deeper recognition that history reaches pivotal moments of reckoning—where old systems collapse, and new ones emerge.

Yet, the Bible clarifies that the “end” does not equate to the annihilation of humanity but rather the end of corrupt civilizations and oppressive systems. As Zephaniah 3:19 declares, “Behold, at that time I will undo all that afflict thee: and I will save her that halteth, and gather her that was driven out; and I will get them praise and fame in every land where they have been put to shame.” This prophecy speaks of a divine restoration rather than universal ruin.

Armageddon: A Spiritual Battle

The concept of Armageddon has also been frequently distorted. Many interpret it as a physical battle of world-ending proportions. However, its origins point to a deeper, spiritual confrontation.

The name “Armageddon” derives from the Hebrew Har Megiddo, referring to the ancient city of Megiddo in northern Israel. It is mentioned in Revelation 16:16: “And he gathered them together into a place called in the Hebrew tongue Armageddon.” While this has been taken to imply a literal battlefield, biblical exegesis and texts such as the Book of Enoch suggest that Armageddon symbolizes the final struggle between divine truth and deception, good and evil.

Jeremiah 23:3 reinforces this interpretation: “And I will gather the remnant of my flock out of all countries whither I have driven them, and will bring them again to their folds; and they shall be fruitful and increase.” Here, the “gathering” is not merely physical but represents the restoration of righteousness.

The Fire of Purification

Many fear apocalyptic descriptions of fire and destruction, citing passages such as 2 Peter 3:12-13: “Looking for and hasting unto the coming of the day of God, wherein the heavens being on fire shall be dissolved, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat? Nevertheless we, according to his promise, look for new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness.”

However, fire in the biblical context often symbolizes purification rather than obliteration. Malachi 3:2 describes God as a refiner’s fire, purging the impure and preparing His people for a new era. The destruction alluded to is not one of extinction but of transformation—the removal of wickedness so that righteousness can prevail.

The Harvest: Separating Wheat from Tares

Jesus Himself described the end times in agricultural terms, emphasizing the separation of the righteous from the explaining that both will grow together until the time of harvest. Then, the tares (symbolic of the wicked) will be gathered and burned, while the wheat (the faithful) will be stored safely.

This aligns with texts like the Book of Jubilees, which prophesies a time when the faithful will be restored to their rightful place while the unrighteous face judgment. The Apocalypse, therefore, is not about global destruction but about the triumph of truth over deception.

Conclusion: The Apocalypse is Now

The Apocalypse is not a far-off event—it is happening now. The unveiling of truth is occurring before our eyes, as falsehoods crumble and hidden realities come to light. Those who have built their civilizations on lies, oppression, and deception are the ones who fear this transformation, as it spells the end of their era. However, for those who seek God’s wisdom and righteousness, the Apocalypse is not a cause for fear but for hope.

Revelation 21:1 gives the final vision: “And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea.” This is not an end, but a new beginning—a world where truth reigns, and God’s people are restored.

Let those who have ears to hear, hear: The Apocalypse is not of destruction, but revelation.

0
Culture Featured Hidden Knowledge Homosexuality Life Religion & Spirituality

You Are Being Sodomized by the Sodomites and it isn’t the Gays

By atlcustoms — 8 years ago

Many have been taught that Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed solely because of homosexuality—that these cities were filled with men engaged in same-sex relations, prompting God to burn them down. This belief is reinforced by the English word “sodomy,” which is defined as sexual acts involving anal or oral intercourse. The term originates from medieval Latin sodomia, referencing Genesis 19:5, where the men of Sodom demand to “know” Lot’s guests. This passage has been commonly interpreted as an indication of homosexual rape.

But is this truly the full story? Let’s take a closer look at what the Bible and other historical texts actually say about Sodom and Gomorrah.

What Does Scripture Say?

In Genesis 18:20-21, God declares that Sodom and Gomorrah’s sins are “very grievous,” prompting Him to investigate further.

Genesis 18:20-21
“And the Lord said, Because the cry of Sodom and Gomorrah is great, and because their sin is very grievous; I will go down now, and see whether they have done altogether according to the cry of it, which is come unto me; and if not, I will know.”

In Genesis 19, the men of Sodom surround Lot’s home and demand that he bring out his guests so that they may “know” them. This phrase has often been interpreted as a request for sexual relations.

Genesis 19:4-5
“But before they lay down, the men of the city, even the men of Sodom, compassed the house round, both old and young, all the people from every quarter: And they called unto Lot, and said unto him, Where are the men which came in to thee this night? bring them out unto us, that we may know them.”

Lot refuses and even offers his daughters instead, further reinforcing the idea that the men’s intent was violent and immoral.

What Does “Know” Really Mean?

The original Hebrew word for “know” in Genesis 19:5 has often been translated as “to have sexual relations.” However, an alternative reading suggests that the more accurate translation is “to bed“—a reference not to sex, but to an act of torture.

This idea is supported by the Book of Jasher (The book of the Upright), an ancient text referenced in Joshua 10:13 and 2 Samuel 1:18. This book provides additional details on the practices of Sodom and Gomorrah, revealing that “bedding” was a form of sadistic punishment rather than a sexual act.

Jasher 19:3 And by desire of their four judges the people of Sodom and Gomorrah had beds erected in the streets of the cities, and if a man came to these places they laid hold of him and brought him to one of their beds, and by force made him to lie in them.
4 And as he lay down, three men would stand at his head and three at his feet, and measure him by the length of the bed, and if the man was less than the bed these six men would stretch him at each end, and when he cried out to them they would not answer him.
5 And if he was longer than the bed they would draw together the two sides of the bed at each end, until the man had reached the gates of death.
6 And if he continued to cry out to them, they would answer him, saying, Thus shall it be done to a man that cometh into our land.
7 And when men heard all these things that the people of the cities of Sodom did, they refrained from coming there.

What Was “Bedding” in Sodom and Gomorrah?

The Book of Jasher describes the horrific custom of “bedding” strangers who entered the city:

  1. Special beds were placed in the streets. If a traveler entered Sodom, the people would seize him and force him onto one of these beds.
  2. If the man was shorter than the bed, they would stretch him until his body fit its length.
  3. If he was taller than the bed, they would cut him down to size.
  4. If he cried out, they would ignore his pleas for mercy and declare that this was simply the custom of the land.

This was not an act of sexual desire but one of cruelty, humiliation, and brutality.

Genesis 19:7 And said, I pray you, brethren, do not so wickedly. 8 Behold now, I have two daughters which have not known man; let me, I pray you, bring them out unto you, and do ye to them as is good in your eyes: only unto these men do nothing; 9 And they said, Stand back. And they said again, This one fellow came in to sojourn;

Understanding Lot’s Offer and the Corruption of Sodom

In Genesis 19:7-9, Lot attempts to reason with the violent mob outside his home, urging them not to commit wickedness. He then offers his virgin daughters instead, but the crowd refuses and insists on seizing the strangers (the angels).

Many have interpreted this passage to mean that Lot was trying to appease a group of raging homosexuals who wanted to sexually violate the angels. According to this view, the mob rejected his daughters because they were only interested in same-sex relations.

However, the Book of Jasher provides additional context that challenges this interpretation.

The Sin of Sodom: More Than Just Sexual Immorality

According to Jasher 18:13-15, the people of Sodom engaged in public sexual violence and ritualistic abuse during their city-wide festivals. This passage describes how men took their neighbors’ wives and daughters, violating them in plain sight, while their husbands and fathers remained silent. This reveals a deeply corrupt and lawless society where rape and brutality were normalized, not just among men but against women as well.

Thus, when Lot offered his daughters, he was not simply presenting an alternative to an act of homosexuality. Instead, he was making a desperate attempt to protect his guests from a sadistic form of torture that the Sodomites regularly inflicted on strangers.

“And He Will Needs Be a Judge” – The Corrupt Legal System of Sodom

The mob’s response in Genesis 19:9 reveals their hostility toward Lot for attempting to judge their actions:

“And they said, Stand back. And they said again, This one fellow came in to sojourn, and he will needs be a judge: now will we deal worse with thee, than with them.”

The Book of Jasher 19:1-2 expands on this, describing how Sodom had a deeply unjust judicial system run by four corrupt judges. The names of these judges were later translated by Abraham’s servant Eliezer, revealing the nature of their rule:

  • Serak (The Abundant One) → Shakra (The Lustful One)
  • Sharkad (The Free One) → Shakura (The Doubly Lustful One)
  • Zebnac (The Giving One) → Kezobim (The Lost Wanderer, The Confused One)
  • Menon (The Consoling One) → Matzlodin (The One Who Does Not Seek Justice)

These names expose the city’s culture of excess, lust, lawlessness, and injustice. The people of Sodom and Gomorrah did not just engage in immorality—they created a legal system that protected and encouraged wickedness while punishing the righteous.

The Wicked Laws and Customs of Sodom and Gomorrah

The Book of Jasher expands on the deep corruption and brutality that defined Sodom and Gomorrah. Their society was not just immoral but deliberately cruel and unjust, targeting the weak, the poor, and even their own people who showed compassion.

A Corrupt Judicial System

One story from Jasher 19:12-21 illustrates the complete perversion of justice in Sodom:

  • Eliezer, Abraham’s servant, witnessed a man of Sodom attack a stranger, steal his clothes, and leave him naked.
  • When Eliezer intervened to help, the attacker struck Eliezer on the forehead with a stone, causing him to bleed.
  • Shockingly, the attacker demanded payment, claiming that the act of drawing blood was a service, and this was “the custom of the land.”
  • When Eliezer refused, the man took him before Shakra, the judge of Sodom, who ruled in favor of the attacker, ordering Eliezer to pay for his own injury.

This reveals that Sodom’s legal system was not about justice, but about justifying evil.

Systematic Oppression of Strangers and the Poor

The Book of Jasher explains the meaning behind Genesis 18:20, where God declares that the “cry of Sodom and Gomorrah is great”—this was the suffering of the innocent at the hands of a wicked people.

1. Robbing Travelers (Jasher 18:16-17)

  • When a traveler came to Sodom, the entire city would gang up on him, stealing his goods little by little.
  • If he protested, each thief would say, “I only took a little,” until he had nothing left.
  • Once the traveler was left penniless, they would chase him out of the city.

2. Starving the Poor to Death (Jasher 19:8-10)

  • If a poor man entered the city, the people would give him gold and silver, but they would refuse to give him food, ensuring he would starve.
  • When he eventually died, they would take back their money and strip his body of clothing.
  • This cruel practice was repeated every time a poor person entered their land.

The Righteousness of Paltith and Her Martyrdom

One of the most tragic stories involves Paltith, Lot’s daughter.

  • A poor man came to Sodom seeking food, but the city’s cruel law forbade anyone from helping him.
  • Paltith secretly fed him by hiding bread in her water pitcher when she went to fetch water.
  • The people became suspicious when the man survived for many days without food and set a trap.
  • They caught Paltith in the act of giving him bread and brought her before the judges.
  • Her punishment? The people of Sodom burned her alive in the street.

A similar fate befell a young woman in Admah, another city in the region:

  • She offered bread and water to a weary traveler who had nowhere to stay.
  • The people accused her of violating their laws against hospitality.
  • Her punishment was horrific—she was covered in honey and left to be stung to death by bees.
  • Her cries of agony reached the heavens.

The Justification for Sodom’s Destruction

These accounts explain why God declared in Genesis 18:20-21 that Sodom and Gomorrah’s sin was “very grievous.” Their evil was not just about sexual immorality—it was an entire culture built on:

  1. Systematic oppression of the poor and vulnerable
  2. Corrupt courts that rewarded wickedness
  3. Torture and public executions of those who showed compassion
  4. A complete rejection of justice, mercy, and righteousness

God’s judgment on Sodom and Gomorrah was not just an act of divine wrath—it was divine justice against a people who had made cruelty their law.

The Wickedness of Sodom and Gomorrah and God’s Judgment

The Book of Jasher gives deeper insight into the extreme wickedness that consumed Sodom and Gomorrah. Their sins went beyond immorality—they were a people who delighted in cruelty, especially toward the poor and those passing through their cities.

A City of Cruelty and Injustice

  • The people of Sodom were not just inhospitable; they were intentionally brutal.
  • They tortured and starved the poor and needy, refusing to give them even a morsel of bread until they died.
  • If anyone dared to help a starving person, they too would be tortured and put to death.
  • Once their victims died, the people would rob them of all their possessions, even fighting over their belongings until the strongest person claimed them.
  • This was not an isolated practice—it was their law. Anyone who entered their land was subject to their violence, and they would say:
    “Thus shall it be done to any man that enters our land.”
  • They were like a lawless gang of violent mobsters, committing rape, robbery, pillaging, plundering, and murder without remorse.

Why God’s Judgment Was Inevitable

The Bible records in Genesis 19:13 that God’s angels declared:
“For we will destroy this place, because the cry of them is waxen great before the face of the Lord; and the Lord hath sent us to destroy it.”

The Book of Jasher explains why their sins were so great:

  • Jasher 19:44 – Sodom had plenty of food and peace within their land, yet they refused to help the poor and needy.
  • Jasher 19:45 – Their sins became so great that God sent His angels to destroy the city.

Even the Prophet Ezekiel reveals why Sodom was destroyed:

  • Ezekiel 16:49-50 – Their sins were pride, laziness, excess, and cruelty to the poor.
  • Despite having everything they needed, they chose to oppress and mistreat others.
  • Their haughtiness and abominations led God to wipe them out.

God’s Justice and the Perversion of His Law

God is a God of wisdom, justice, and righteousness. He does not only distinguish right from wrong but also just from unjust, fair from unfair. Everything He does has a purpose and reason.

However, there are those who twist God’s laws to fit their own agenda—condemning people based on a part of the law rather than the whole truth.

  • When people spread a distorted version of God’s judgment, they corrupt the understanding of the people.
  • This perversion of God’s law leads to a society that is wicked, unjust, and immoral, just like Sodom and Gomorrah.

Sodom was destroyed because of unchecked evil, and its fate serves as a warning to any nation that rejects justice, mercy, and righteousness in favor of oppression and corruption.

The Spirit of Sodom: Oppression, Injustice, and Cruelty

Sodom and Gomorrah were not just cities of immorality—they were places of systematic oppression, cruelty, and injustice, where the strong preyed on the weak without mercy. Their legacy lives on wherever injustice flourishes.

  • If you use your power to exploit the poor and needy while they suffer and perish, you are acting in the spirit of Sodom.
  • If you are trapped in a system designed to keep you poor, sick, and powerless while others profit from your suffering, you are experiencing the same oppression as the victims of Sodom.
  • If the justice system is built to work against the vulnerable, enforcing unfair and biased laws that strip them of their dignity, wealth, and even their lives while benefiting the rich and powerful—you are witnessing the modern-day spirit of Sodom in action.
  • If you are drowning in debt, struggling under a system that keeps you weak while others grow stronger off your hardship, you are being exploited just as the oppressed were in Sodom.
  • If you live in a place where those in power declare, “We do not want you in our land,” and they subject your people to cruel and inhumane treatment—starvation, torture, public executions, lynchings, and other forms of brutal punishment—you are living in a modern-day Sodom.

Sodom was not just a city—it was a system, a mindset, and a way of life that glorified oppression and fed on injustice. Wherever greed, cruelty, and exploitation thrive at the expense of the poor and powerless, the spirit of Sodom is alive—and history shows that God does not leave such evil unpunished.

Listen To The Full Book Of Jasher Here
0
Hidden Knowledge

Very Questionable Presidential Executive Orders

By atlcustoms — 8 years ago

[vc_row el_class=”td-scandal-videos”][vc_column][td_block_video_youtube playlist_title=”The King Alfred Plan aka Rex 84 ” playlist_yt=”myfV_jcJABQ, _-lKWTrVO_o, gstBozWfhQ, -gstBozWfhQ, 4IeuE16LLDY, 6mr97qyKA2s, 7UXEBDIdVWk, SrdtJvQtJGo, R6dMxH5VvZ4, dn68n75B_SE, “][/vc_column][/vc_row]

[vc_row el_class=”td-scandal-instagram”][vc_column][td_block_instagram instagram_id=”atlcustoms” instagram_images_per_row=”5″ instagram_number_of_rows=”2″ instagram_margin=”2″][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Scroll to top